VALIDATION DATA

MEASUREMENT PROPERTIES
Limitations <5 European languages (English)
Observations
1. RELIABILITY
A. Internal Consistency Tested
Cronbach's (Describe)

The Cronbach’s alpha was estimated to be 0.83.

B. Reliability intraobserver or test-retest Tested
Continuous scores: intraclass
correlation coefficient (ICC)
Dichotomus: Cohen kappa (Describe)

Mean difference between measures: -0.53 points (test: 40.4 +/-6.1; retest 39.9 +/- 6.4). 

The intraclass correlation coefficient was found to be 0.92.

C. Reliability interobserver or Measurement error Not Tested
Standard error of measurement (SEM),
smallest detectable change (SDC) or
Limits of agreement (LoA) (Describe)
2. VALIDITY
A. Content validity: face validity Not Tested
Expert opinion (relevance and
comprehensiveness) (Describe)
B. Construct Validity:
Structural validity
Tested
Hypotheses-testing Tested
Cross-cultural validity Tested
Brief Description

Exploratory factor analysis supported validity of the one-factor structure, however, confirmatory factor analysis suggested better properties in relation to a two-factor structure (χ2 = 59.52; CFI = 0.98; TLI = 0.96; RMSEA = 0.06). The two factors could be broadly described as "subjectively estimated work ability" and "ill-health-related ability".

C. Criterion validity Tested
Comparison with a 'gold standard' Continuous scores:
correlations, ROC curves Dichotomus:
Sensitivity & Specificity (Describe)

Analyses of correlations showed predictive power of WAI as strong and consistent with expected directions. It turned out that the higher WAI, the higher individual’s General Health Index; the lower burnout due to work; and the lower van Korff disability index. In the total sample mentioned, coefficients amounted to r = -0.62, -0.54 and -0.52 (respectively).

Criterion validity analysis showed that this instrument and all dimensions of the Iranian version of SF-36 were correlated significantly. Item correlation corrective for overlap showed the items tests had a good correlation except for one.