Detailled Information

Name of the Instrument/Tool Health-related productivity questionnaire diary (HRPQ-D)
First Description

Kumar RN, Hass SL, Li JZ, Nickens DJ, Daenzer CL, Wathen LK. Validation of the Health-Related Productivity Questionnaire Diary (HRPQ-D) on a sample of patients with infectious mononucleosis: results from a phase 1 multicenter clinical trial. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine. 2003;45(8):899-907. Epub 2003/08/14.

Year 2003
Domains
Concept of constructs Work
Population/Disease Generic
Originally developed for ---
Other rheumatic diseases
where can be applied (only if validated)
---
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases No
Language: Originally published in English
Available in Language English
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
Author/s Kumar, RN
Title Validation of the Health-related Productivity Questionnaire Diary (HRPQ-D) on a sample of patients with infectious mononucleosis: Results from a Phase 1 Multicenter Clinical Trial.
Journal J Occup Environ Medicine
Year 2003
Vol 45
Num 8
Pages 899-907
Country US
Language English
Other references of interest
No other References.
Instrument/Tool Translations References
No other References.
DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION
Correspondence to Steven L. Hass,
E-Mail steven.l.hass@pharmacia.com
Address Global Outcomes Research, Pharmacia Corp., 7000 Portage Road, 298-155, Kalamazoo, MI 49001
Website ---
Available ---
Links ---
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Type Of Measure Questionnaire
Brief Description

The HRPQ was designed to provide data relating to health-related labor force participation, including premature retirement or reduction from full-time to part-time employment, absenteeism (missed work hours at paid employment, in the home, or at educational activities) and presenteeism (reduced effectiveness during any work that is attempted).“ (pg. 901

Number of Items ---
Range ---
Responses options/scale No
Developed for ---
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Method of administration ---
Recommendations to score ---
Score Interpretation ---
Cut-off points ---
Cut-off points applied to ---
Smallest detectable change if described ---
Smallest detectable change applied to ---
Completion time by the patient 0 minutes
Scoring time by the assessor 0 minutes
Training to score Not necessary
Strengths ---
Limitations Copyrighted
OTHER COMMENTS
Other Comments ---