Detailled Information

Name of the Instrument/Tool Endicott Work Productivity Scale (EWPS)
First Description

Endicott J, Nee J. Endicott. Work Productivity Scale (EWPS): a new measure to assess treatment effects. Psychopharmacology bulletin. 1997;33(1):13.

Year 1997
Domains
Concept of constructs ---
Population/Disease Disease specific
Originally developed for ---
Other rheumatic diseases
where can be applied (only if validated)
---
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases No
Language: Originally published in ---
Available in Language ---
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
Author/s Endicott J, Nee J. Endicott
Title Work Productivity Scale (EWPS): a new measure to assess treatment effects.
Journal Psychopharmacology bulletin
Year 1997
Vol 33
Num 1
Pages 13-6
Country USA
Language English
Other references of interest
Link https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23466017
Brief Description

Sensibility of five at-work productivity measures was endorsed by patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis.

Link https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26679938
Brief Description

Critical Appraisal of the Quality of Literature Evaluating Psychometric Properties of Arthritis Work Outcome Assessments: A Systematic Review.

Link https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20191488
Brief Description

Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of five at-work productivity measures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis.

Instrument/Tool Translations References
Link https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15362005
Brief Description

The purpose of the study was to investigate reliability and validity of the Turkish form of EWPS.

DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION
Correspondence to ---
E-Mail ---
Address ---
Website ---
Available ---
Links ---
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Type Of Measure ---
Brief Description ---
Number of Items ---
Range ---
Responses options/scale No
Developed for ---
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Method of administration ---
Recommendations to score ---
Score Interpretation ---
Cut-off points ---
Cut-off points applied to ---
Smallest detectable change if described ---
Smallest detectable change applied to ---
Completion time by the patient 0 minutes
Scoring time by the assessor 0 minutes
Training to score Not necessary
Strengths ---
Limitations ---
OTHER COMMENTS
Other Comments ---