Detailled Information

Name of the Instrument/Tool Ergonomic Assessment Tool for Arthritis (EATA)
First Description

Backman CL, Village J, Lacaille D. The ergonomic assessment tool for arthritis: development and pilot testing. Arthritis Care & Research. 2008;59(10):1495-503.

Year 2008
Domains
Concept of constructs Work
Population/Disease Disease specific
Originally developed for ---
Other rheumatic diseases
where can be applied (only if validated)
---
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases No
Language: Originally published in English
Available in Language ---
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
Author/s Backman CL, Village J, Lacaille D.
Title The Ergonomic Assessment Tool for Arthritis: Development and Pilot Testing.
Journal Arthritis & Rheumatism
Year 2008
Vol 59
Num 10
Pages 1495-1503
Country Canada
Language English
Other references of interest
Link http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18975352
Brief Description

Lacaille D, White MA, Rogers PA, Backman CL, Gignac MAM, Esdaile JM. (2008): Employment and arthritis: Making it work – A proof of concept study. Arthritis & Rheumatism,  volume 59, no. 11.

Instrument/Tool Translations References
No other References.
DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION
Correspondence to Catherine Backman
E-Mail Catherine.backman@ubc.ca
Address ---
Website http://www.arthritisresearch.ca/ergo-tool.html
Available ---
Links ---
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Type Of Measure ---
Brief Description

individualized: 5 screening questions – subsequently only relevant questions of the respective job demand section are asked; These questions focus on sitting, prolonged standing/kneeling/walking/stair climbing, gripping or grasping objects, lifting or carrying, pushing or pulling

Number of Items ---
Range ---
Responses options/scale No
Developed for Clinical practice
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Method of administration Self-administered
Recommendations to score ---
Score Interpretation ---
Cut-off points ---
Cut-off points applied to ---
Smallest detectable change if described ---
Smallest detectable change applied to ---
Completion time by the patient 29(10-45) minutes
Scoring time by the assessor 60(45-95) minutes
Training to score Not necessary
Strengths ---
Limitations ---
OTHER COMMENTS
Other Comments ---