Detailled Information

Name of the Instrument/Tool Children's Arthritis Self-Efficacy (CASE)
First Description

Barlow J, Shaw K, Wright C. Development and preliminary validation of a Children's Arthritis Self‐Efficacy Scale. Arthritis Care & Research. 2001;45(2):159-66.

Year 2001
Domains
Concept of constructs Coping & helplessness
Population/Disease Disease specific
Originally developed for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA)
Other rheumatic diseases
where can be applied (only if validated)
---
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases No
Language: Originally published in English
Available in Language English, Finnish
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
Author/s Barlow J, Shaw K, Wright C
Title Development and Preliminary Validation of a Children’s Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale
Journal ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM (ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH)
Year 2001
Vol 45
Num 2
Pages 159-166
Country UK
Language English
Other references of interest
No other References.
Instrument/Tool Translations References
Link http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17631752
Brief Description

Vuorimaa et al., Improved factor structure for self-efficacy scales for children with JIA (CASE) and their parents (PASE). Translation of the PASE in Finnish

DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION
Correspondence to J. H. Barlow, BA
E-Mail j.barlow@coventry.ac.uk.
Address Psychosocial Research Centre, Chronic Conditions & Disability, Child & Family Health Group, Coventry University CV1 5FB, UK.
Website ---
Available ---
Links

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1529-0131(200104)45:2%3C159::AID-ANR169%3E3.0.CO;2-2/pdf

DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Type Of Measure Questionnaire
Brief Description

The CASE was developed as a simple, short measure for

use among samples of school-age children with JIA, aged between 7 and 17 years. It was designed to assess children’s arthritis self-efficacy beliefs in areas perceived to be salient by children themselves, couched in the vocabulary of the target population.

Number of Items 11 items, 3 subscales “activity” (4 items), “symptom” (4 items) and “emotion” (3 items)
Range not specified
Responses options/scale Yes
a 5-point response format was used anchored by by “not at all sure” to “very sure.”
Developed for Not specified
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Method of administration Self-administered
Recommendations to score ---
Score Interpretation The higher score corresponds to a higher certainty of the subject that he/she can perform each of the tasks
Cut-off points ---
Cut-off points applied to ---
Smallest detectable change if described ---
Smallest detectable change applied to ---
Completion time by the patient requiring less than 5 minutes to be scored minutes
Scoring time by the assessor 0 minutes
Training to score Not necessary
Strengths Easy to use
Limitations ---
OTHER COMMENTS
Other Comments ---