Detailled Information

Name of the Instrument/Tool Osteoporosis Patient Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q™ )
First Description

Flood EM, Beusterien KM, Green H, Shikiar R, Baran RW, Amonkar MM, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Osteoporosis Patient Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q™), a novel measure to assess satisfaction with bisphosphonate treatment in postmenopausal women. Health and quality of life outcomes. 2006;4(1):42.

Year 2006
Domains
Concept of constructs Satisfaction
Population/Disease Disease specific
Originally developed for Osteoporosis (OP)
Other rheumatic diseases
where can be applied (only if validated)
---
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases No
Language: Originally published in English
Available in Language English
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
Author/s Flood EM, Beusterien KM, Green H, Shikiar R, Baran RW, Amonkar MM, et al
Title Psychometric evaluation of the Osteoporosis Patient Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q™ )
Journal Health and Quality of life outcomes
Year 2006
Vol 4
Num 1
Pages 42
Country USA
Language English
Other references of interest
No other References.
Instrument/Tool Translations References
No other References.
DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION
Correspondence to Emuella M. Flood
E-Mail emuella.flood@oxfordoutcomes.com
Address Oxford Outcomes Inc., Bethesda, USA
Website ---
Available ---
Links ---
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Type Of Measure Scale
Brief Description

Measurement of patient satisfaction with osteoporosis. There are 4 subscales scores (convenience, daily activities, overall satisfaction and side effects) and an overall composite satisfaction score (CSS)

Number of Items 16
Range 0-100
Responses options/scale Yes
confidence and daily functioning and overall satisfaction and 5-point scale for side effects. For calculating the CSS all the OPSAT-Q scales are summarized and transformed to a 0 to 100 scale
Developed for Both
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Method of administration Self-administered
Recommendations to score

Domains scores are calculated by summing the items of the domain and transforming the score to 0 to 100 scale

Score Interpretation Higher scores represented higher satisfaction
Cut-off points ---
Cut-off points applied to ---
Smallest detectable change if described ---
Smallest detectable change applied to ---
Completion time by the patient 0 minutes
Scoring time by the assessor 0 minutes
Training to score Not necessary
Strengths Useful in clinical practice & research
Limitations Copyrighted, Lengthy
OTHER COMMENTS
Other Comments ---