Detailled Information

Name of the Instrument/Tool Osteoporosis Functional Disability Questionnaire (OFDQ)
First Description

Helmes E, Hodsman A, Lazowski D, et al. A questionnaire to evaluate disability in osteoporotic patients with vertebral compression fractures. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995;50:M91-8.

Year 1995
Domains
Concept of constructs Physical function
Population/Disease Disease specific
Originally developed for Osteoporosis (OP)
Other rheumatic diseases
where can be applied (only if validated)
---
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases No
Language: Originally published in English
Available in Language English
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
Author/s Helmes E, Hodsman A, Lazowski D, et al.
Title A questionnaire to evaluate disability in osteoporotic patients with vertebral compression fractures.
Journal J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci
Year 1995
Vol 50
Num 2
Pages M91-M98
Country US
Language English
Other references of interest
No other References.
Instrument/Tool Translations References
No other References.
DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION
Correspondence to A.B. Hodsman,
E-Mail ---
Address Department of Medicine, Room 2-402, St. Joseph's Health Centre, 268 Grosvenor Street, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 4V2
Website ---
Available ---
Links ---
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Type Of Measure Questionnaire, Scale
Brief Description

questionnaire which evaluates disability in osteoporotic patients with vertebral compression fractures. Domains are quantitative indices of pain, a standard 20-item depression scale, 26 items relating to functional abilities, a scale of social activities, and confidence in the ability of prescribed osteoporosis treatment to reverse disability.

Number of Items 59
Range ---
Responses options/scale No
Developed for Both
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Method of administration Self-administered
Recommendations to score ---
Score Interpretation For all domains except the ADL items, an increasing score represented increasing disability; for the ADL category the reverse was true : increasing score represented decreasing disability.
Cut-off points ---
Cut-off points applied to ---
Smallest detectable change if described ---
Smallest detectable change applied to ---
Completion time by the patient 25 minutes
Scoring time by the assessor 0 minutes
Training to score Not necessary
Strengths ---
Limitations Complex scoring, Lengthy
OTHER COMMENTS
Other Comments ---