Detailled Information

Name of the Instrument/Tool New Knee Society Knee Scoring System (2011 KSS)
First Description

Noble PC, Scuderi GR, Brekke AC, Sikorskii A, Benjamin JB, Lonner JH, Chadha P, Daylamani DA, Scott WN, Bourne RB. Development of a new Knee Society scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan;470(1):20-32

Year 2012
Domains
Concept of constructs Functional status
Population/Disease Disease specific
Originally developed for Osteoarthritis (OA)
Other rheumatic diseases
where can be applied (only if validated)
---
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases Yes
Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)
Language: Originally published in English
Available in Language Korean, German, Portuguese, Spanish, Japanese, French, Turkish, Chinese, Dutch
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
Author/s Noble PC, Scuderi GR, Brekke AC, Sikorskii A, Benjamin JB, Lonner JH, Chadha P, Daylamani DA, Scott WN, Bourne RB.
Title Development of a new Knee Society scoring system.
Journal Clin Orthop Relat Res
Year 2012
Vol 470
Num 1
Pages 20-32
Country USA
Language English
Other references of interest
Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22045067/
Brief Description

The new Knee Society Knee Scoring System

Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29529620/
Brief Description

Validity and Internal Consistency of the New Knee Society Knee Scoring System

Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2805470/
Brief Description

Rationale of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System

Instrument/Tool Translations References
Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30418278/
Brief Description

Translation and Validation of the German New Knee Society Scoring System

Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33033845/
Brief Description

Translation and validation of the new knee society knee scoring system into Spanish: Spanish KSS translation

Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25982223/
Brief Description

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Japanese version of the new Knee Society Scoring System for osteoarthritic knee with total knee arthroplasty

DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION
Correspondence to Philip C Noble
E-Mail pnoble@bcm.edu
Address ---
Website ---
Available ---
Links

https://www.kneesociety.org/assets/2011KSS%20Support%20Materials.pdf

DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Type Of Measure Composite Index
Brief Description

The final design of the new Knee Society Scoring System consists of four subscales: (1) Objective Knee Score (seven items; 100 points), (2) Satisfaction Score (five items; 40 points), (3) Expectation Score (three items; 15 points), and (4) Functional Activity Score (19 items; 100 points). It includes versions to be administered preoperatively and postoperatively.

Number of Items 34
Range 0-245
Responses options/scale No
Developed for Both
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Method of administration Physician, Self-administered
Recommendations to score

It varies according to the subscale:

  • Objective Knee Score: “Alignment” has a maximum of 25 points and is determined on a weight-bearing AP radiograph measuring the femoral-tibial (Anatomic) axis. “Instability” allows a maximum of 25 points for a knee that is stable in the coronal and saggital axis. “Joint Motion” allows one point for each 5° of joint motion. Unlike the old scoring system that allowed a maximum of 25 points the new system allows greater than 25 points for patients with greater than 125° of motion. There are deductions for flexion contracture and extension lag. The presence of recurvatum is not specifically addressed however patients with recurvatum will have significant ligament laxity in other planes that is captured in the “Instability” category of the objective score. Maximum allowable points 25+ “Symptoms” category contains two 10-level scales, ranging from “none” to “severe” for each patient to rate their pain with walking on level ground and on stairs/inclines. The patient starts with 10 points on each scale for a painless knee with deductions of up to 10 points deductions as indicated by the patient’s response on each pain scale. There is an additional question regarding how “normal” the knee feels to the patient. Maximum allowable points 25.
  • Patient Expectations is a three-question fifteen-point scale that is collected pre-operatively and post-operatively. 
  • Patient Satisfaction is a five-question 40-point scale that is collected preoperatively and at each follow-up visit.
  • Functional Score is composed of four subgroups (Walking and Standing, Standard Activities, Advanced Activities, Discretionary Activities) and has a maximum score of 100.
Score Interpretation Higher scores indicate better function
Cut-off points A score of 50 indicates adequate knee function
Cut-off points applied to ---
Smallest detectable change if described ---
Smallest detectable change applied to ---
Completion time by the patient - minutes
Scoring time by the assessor - minutes
Training to score Not necessary
Strengths Widely used, Easy to use, Useful in clinical practice & research
Limitations ---
OTHER COMMENTS
Other Comments ---