Detailled Information

Name of the Instrument/Tool Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI)
First Description

Daltroy LH, Liang MH, Fossel AH, Goldberg MJ. The POSNA pediatric musculoskeletal functional health questionnaire: report on reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Pediatric Outcomes Instrument Development Group. Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998 Sep-Oct;18(5):561-71

Year 1998
Domains
Concept of constructs Functional status, Physical function
Population/Disease Disease specific
Originally developed for ---
Other rheumatic diseases
where can be applied (only if validated)
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA)
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases Yes
Unilateral upper extremity deficiencies
Language: Originally published in English
Available in Language Serbian, Dutch, Portuguese, Spanish, Chinese, Polish
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
Author/s Daltroy LH, Liang MH, Fossel AH, Goldberg MJ.
Title The POSNA pediatric musculoskeletal functional health questionnaire: report on reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Pediatric Outcomes Instrument Development Group. Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America.
Journal J Pediatr Orthop.
Year 1998
Vol 18
Num 5
Pages 561-71
Country USA
Language English
Other references of interest
Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23818145/
Brief Description

Comparing the psychometric properties of the pediatric outcomes data collection instrument and the activities scales for kids: a review

Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11521030/
Brief Description

The Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America pediatric orthopaedic functional health questionnaire: an analysis of normals

Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12634568/
Brief Description

The Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) and functional assessment in patients with adolescent or juvenile idiopathic scoliosis and congenital scoliosis or kyphosis

Instrument/Tool Translations References
Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24171906/
Brief Description

Validation of the Brazilian version of the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument: a cross-sectional evaluation in children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26354604/
Brief Description

The Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument for a Polish sample with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: psychometric properties of proxy version

Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27285802/
Brief Description

 Reliability of cross-cultural adapted Turkish version of the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI).

DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION
Correspondence to Matthew H Liang
E-Mail mhliang@bics.bwh.harvard.edu
Address https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/matthew-liang/
Website ---
Available ---
Links ---
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Type Of Measure Questionnaire
Brief Description

The PODCI contains 86 items that measure six domains: upper extremity function, transfers andmobility, sports participation, pain and comfort, global function, and happiness with physicalcondition

The items’ possible scores range from 3 (for response choices indicating ‘often,’ ‘sometimes,’ or ‘rarely or never’) to 6 (for response choices indicating ‘none,’‘very mild,’ ‘mild,’ ‘moderate,’ ‘severe,’ or ‘very severe’). Each of the above domains has a possible range of 0–100. The scoring algorithm of the PODCI includes six subscale scores and one global summary score. Additionally, this instrument isavailable in three formats: (a) a parent-report format for children (age birth to 10 years), (b) aparent-report format for adolescents (age 11–18 years), and (c) an adolescent-report format foradolescents (age 11–18 years).

Number of Items 86
Range 0-100
Responses options/scale Yes
From 3 to 6
Developed for Both
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Method of administration Self-administered, Interviewer/assessor
Recommendations to score

The pediatric form (2 years to 10 years 11 months) is completed by parents. The adolescent form (11 years to 18 years 11 months) is answered by parents (parent report) and adolescents (self-report).

Score Interpretation Lower scores indicate better physical function
Cut-off points ---
Cut-off points applied to ---
Smallest detectable change if described ---
Smallest detectable change applied to ---
Completion time by the patient - minutes
Scoring time by the assessor - minutes
Training to score -
Strengths Widely used, Useful in clinical practice & research, Easy to use
Limitations ---
OTHER COMMENTS
Other Comments ---