| Name of the Instrument/Tool | Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) |
| First Description |
Sullivan MJL, Bishop SR, Pivik, J.The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation. Psychol Assess, 1995;7(4):524–532. |
| Year | 1995 |
| Domains | |
| Concept of constructs | Pain, Fear |
| Population/Disease | Disease specific |
| Originally developed for | --- |
| Other rheumatic diseases where can be applied (only if validated) |
Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA), Chronic musculoskeletal pain, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Osteoarthritis (OA), Fibromyalgia (FM) |
| Additional population with no rheumatic diseases |
Yes Chronic Pain |
| Language: Originally published in | English |
| Available in Language | Japanese, German, Thai, Spanish, Russian, Dutch, Italian, French, Chinese, Arabic, Korean, Portuguese |
| REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION | |
| Author/s | Sullivan MJL, Bishop SR, Pivik, J. |
| Title | The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation. |
| Journal | Psychol Assess |
| Year | 1995 |
| Vol | 7 |
| Num | 4 |
| Pages | 524–532 |
| Country | Canada |
| Language | English |
| Other references of interest | |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25766681/ |
| Brief Description |
Development and evaluation of short forms of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and the Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9429990/ |
| Brief Description |
Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30035754/ |
| Brief Description |
Pain and Catastrophizing in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Observational Cohort Study |
| Instrument/Tool Translations References | |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28087217/ |
| Brief Description |
Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of short forms of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in participants with musculoskeletal pain: A cross-sectional study |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18440399/ |
| Brief Description |
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the German version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28616005/ |
| Brief Description |
Development and validation of Arabic version of the pain catastrophizing scale |
| DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION | |
| Correspondence to | Michael J L Sullivan |
| michael.sullivan@mcgill.ca | |
| Address | --- |
| Website | https://sullivan-painresearch.mcgill.ca/ |
| Available | --- |
| Links | --- |
| DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT | |
| Type Of Measure | Scale |
| Brief Description |
The PCS aims to assess catastrophic thinking related to pain among adults with or without chronic pain. The scale comprises 13 items related to magnification (item 6,7,13), rumination (item 8, 9, 10, 11), and helplessness (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12). To facilitate quick screening and to reduce participant's burden, the four-item and six-item short forms of the English version of the PCS were developed. |
| Number of Items | 13 |
| Range | 0-52 |
| Responses options/scale |
Yes 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time) |
| Developed for | Both |
| PRACTICAL APPLICATION | |
| Method of administration | Interviewer/assessor, Self-administered |
| Recommendations to score |
People are asked to indicate the degree to which they have the above thoughts and feelings when they are experiencing pain from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time) The PCS total score is computed by summing responses to all 13 items. The PCS subscales are computed by summing the responses to the following items:
|
| Score Interpretation | Higher score indicates higher catastrophizing |
| Cut-off points | >30 indicates clinically relevant catastrophizing- Subclinical = 0 to 29; Mild = 30 to 39; Moderate = 40 to 49; Severe = 50 to 59; Extreme = 60 to 100. |
| Cut-off points applied to | Routine care |
| Smallest detectable change if described | --- |
| Smallest detectable change applied to | --- |
| Completion time by the patient | 5 minutes |
| Scoring time by the assessor | - minutes |
| Training to score | Not necessary |
| Strengths | Easy to use, Useful in clinical practice & research, Widely used |
| Limitations | --- |
| OTHER COMMENTS | |
| Other Comments | --- |