VALIDATION DATA

MEASUREMENT PROPERTIES
Limitations >=5 European languages (English)
Observations

Two of the 17 potential items showed a particularly strong floor effect, with 70 (66%) and 60 (57%) cases, respectively, giving the response ‘No, not at all’ to items concerned with ‘difficulty using the lavatory’ and ‘trouble with transport’. Consequently, these two items were excluded.

1. RELIABILITY
A. Internal Consistency Tested
Cronbach's (Describe)

The Cronbach’s α coefficients for the three Oxford elbow score domains were pain 0.89, elbow function 0.90, social-psychological 0.84, and following deletion of each item the coefficients revealed that no one item had a particularly large effect on the reliability of each domain.Thus each factor had a high level of internal reliability and none exceeded 0.90, which would indicate item redundancy

B. Reliability intraobserver or test-retest Tested
Continuous scores: intraclass
correlation coefficient (ICC)
Dichotomus: Cohen kappa (Describe)

 The intraclass correlation coefficient comparing these with measures of the Oxford elbow score scales obtained at least 48 hours earlier were pain 0.98, elbow function 0.89 and social-psychological 0.87 (all statistically significant p < 0.001).

C. Reliability interobserver or Measurement error Not Tested
Standard error of measurement (SEM),
smallest detectable change (SDC) or
Limits of agreement (LoA) (Describe)
2. VALIDITY
A. Content validity: face validity Not Tested
Expert opinion (relevance and
comprehensiveness) (Describe)
B. Construct Validity:
Structural validity
Not Tested
Hypotheses-testing Tested
Cross-cultural validity Tested
Brief Description
C. Criterion validity Tested
Comparison with a 'gold standard' Continuous scores:
correlations, ROC curves Dichotomus:
Sensitivity & Specificity (Describe)

The OES Function scale and the DASH performed similarly on ROC analysis, but with the OES Pain and Social-Psychological scales demonstrating superior efficiency.