| Name of the Instrument/Tool | International Hip Outcome Tool short version (iHOT-12) |
| First Description |
Griffin DR, Parsons N, Mohtadi NG, Safran MR; Multicenter Arthroscopy of the Hip Outcomes Research Network. A short version of the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) for use in routine clinical practice. Arthroscopy. 2012 May;28(5):611-6; quiz 616-8. |
| Year | 2012 |
| Domains | |
| Concept of constructs | Health related quality of life |
| Population/Disease | Disease specific |
| Originally developed for | Osteoarthritis (OA) |
| Other rheumatic diseases where can be applied (only if validated) |
--- |
| Additional population with no rheumatic diseases |
Yes Hip disease |
| Language: Originally published in | English |
| Available in Language | German, Swedish, French, Greek |
| REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION | |
| Author/s | Griffin DR, Parsons N, Mohtadi NG, Safran MR. |
| Title | Multicenter Arthroscopy of the Hip Outcomes Research Network. A short version of the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) for use in routine clinical practice. |
| Journal | Arthroscopy. |
| Year | 2012 |
| Vol | 28 |
| Num | 5 |
| Pages | 611-6; quiz 616-8. |
| Country | England |
| Language | English |
| Other references of interest | |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34712978/ |
| Brief Description |
Collection of the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 Using a Smartphone Application Format Is Faster and Preferred When Compared With the Paper Version: A Pilot Study of rHip |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31000393/ |
| Brief Description |
The Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State of the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool at 1-Year Follow-Up of Hip-Preservation Surgery |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30612776/ |
| Brief Description |
Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool |
| Instrument/Tool Translations References | |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26746236/ |
| Brief Description |
Validation of a German version of the International Hip Outcome Tool 12 (iHOT12) according to the COSMIN checklist |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32462334/ |
| Brief Description |
International Hip Outcome Tool (12-items) as health-related quality-of-life measure in osteoarthritis: validation of Greek version |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34601161/ |
| Brief Description |
Validation of the French version of the Self-Administered International Hip Outcome Tool-12 Questionnaire and determination of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in the French speaking population |
| DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION | |
| Correspondence to | Damian R Griffin |
| damian.griffin@warwick.ac.uk | |
| Address | Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, England |
| Website | --- |
| Available | --- |
| Links | --- |
| DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT | |
| Type Of Measure | Questionnaire |
| Brief Description |
The iHOT was developed to provide an evaluation tool for the management of nonarthritic hip problems in young, active patients. iHOT-12 is the shorter form of iHOT-33. The iHOT-12 contains 12 questions, covering four domains: symptoms and functional limitations, sports and recreational activities, job-related concerns and social, emotional and lifestyle concerns. This questionnaire was developed for young-to-middle-aged active people with hip disorders. Each question is answered on a visual analog scale, and a total score is calculated, ranging from 0 (worst QOL) to 100 (best QOL). This questionnaire focuses on asking the patients about the pain and related symptoms of discomfort, and the difficulty afflicted by changing postures. |
| Number of Items | 12 |
| Range | 0-100 |
| Responses options/scale |
No |
| Developed for | --- |
| PRACTICAL APPLICATION | |
| Method of administration | Interviewer/assessor, Self-administered, Online |
| Recommendations to score |
iHOT-12 scores were calculated as the mean visual analog scale score for the individual items for each questionnaire for each patient. |
| Score Interpretation | --- |
| Cut-off points | Scores of 86 points or greater and 56 points or less identify subjects who rated their function as normal and abnormal |
| Cut-off points applied to | --- |
| Smallest detectable change if described | --- |
| Smallest detectable change applied to | --- |
| Completion time by the patient | 5-6 minutes |
| Scoring time by the assessor | - minutes |
| Training to score | Not necessary |
| Strengths | Useful in clinical practice & research |
| Limitations | --- |
| OTHER COMMENTS | |
| Other Comments | --- |