Detailled Information

Name of the Instrument/Tool Self-reported Spine Functional Scale (SSFS)
First Description

Li W, Ding J, Hao X, Jiang W, Song H, Zhang Y, Tan Y. Reliability and validity of the novel self-reported spine functional scale (SSFS) in healthy participants. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Aug 25;16(1):529

Year 2021
Domains
Concept of constructs Functional status
Population/Disease Disease specific
Originally developed for Whole-spinal pain
Other rheumatic diseases
where can be applied (only if validated)
---
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases Yes
Related spinal disorders
Language: Originally published in English
Available in Language ---
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
Author/s Li W, Ding J, Hao X, Jiang W, Song H, Zhang Y, Tan Y.
Title Reliability and validity of the novel self-reported spine functional scale (SSFS) in healthy participants.
Journal J Orthop Surg Res
Year 2021
Vol 16
Num 1
Pages 529
Country China
Language English
Other references of interest
No other References.
Instrument/Tool Translations References
No other References.
DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION
Correspondence to Yan Tan
E-Mail 910532533@qq.com
Address Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Sports Department, Nanjing, China
Website ---
Available ---
Links ---
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Type Of Measure Scale
Brief Description

The novel Self-Reported Spine Functional Scale (SSFS) is applicable to the self-assessment and maintenance of spinal health and the prevention of related spinal disorders in the young healthy population. 

It includes postural assessment in standing and supine; muscle strength tests of neck flexors and abdominal core muscles; and functional assessment of prone press-up, supine knee-to-chest, wall roll-down, and wall angel.

Number of Items 8
Range 8-24
Responses options/scale Yes
Each entry is graded on a 3-point scale
Developed for Both
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Method of administration Self-administered
Recommendations to score

Each entry is graded on a 3-point scale. A score of 0 indicates loss of spinal motor function, a score of 1 indicates severe spinal motor dysfunction, a score of 2 indicates mild to moderate spinal motor dysfunction, and a score of 3 indicates good spinal motor function. 

Score Interpretation A higher score indicates better spinal function
Cut-off points Total score of 20–24 means good, 15–19 means satisfactory, and 0–14 means poor or unsatisfactory
Cut-off points applied to ---
Smallest detectable change if described ---
Smallest detectable change applied to ---
Completion time by the patient - minutes
Scoring time by the assessor - minutes
Training to score Not necessary
Strengths Easy to use
Limitations ---
OTHER COMMENTS
Other Comments ---