| Name of the Instrument/Tool | Health Care Empowerment Questionnaire (HCEQ) |
| First Description |
Gagnon M, Hibert R, Dube M, Dubois M. Development and validation of an instrument measuring individual empowerment in relation to personal health care: the Health Care Empowerment Questionnaire (HCEQ). Am J Heal Promot. 2006;20(6):429-435. |
| Year | 2006 |
| Domains | |
| Concept of constructs | Satisfaction |
| Population/Disease | Generic |
| Originally developed for | Any RMD |
| Other rheumatic diseases where can be applied (only if validated) |
--- |
| Additional population with no rheumatic diseases |
No |
| Language: Originally published in | English |
| Available in Language | Persian |
| REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION | |
| Author/s | Gagnon M, Hibert R, Dubé M, Dubois MF |
| Title | Development and validation of an instrument measuring individual empowerment in relation to personal health care: the Health Care Empowerment Questionnaire (HCEQ). |
| Journal | Am J Health Promot |
| Year | 2006 |
| Vol | 20 |
| Num | 6 |
| Pages | 429-35 |
| Country | Canada |
| Language | English |
| Other references of interest | |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33503330/ |
| Brief Description |
Psychometric characteristics of the health care empowerment questionnaire in a sample of patients with arthritis and rheumatic condition |
| Instrument/Tool Translations References | |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29983534/ |
| Brief Description |
Testing Psychometrics of Healthcare Empowerment Questionnaires (HCEQ) among Iranian Reproductive Age Women: Persian Version |
| DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION | |
| Correspondence to | Maxime Gagnon |
| maxine.gagnon@usherbrooke.ca | |
| Address | Research Center on Aging, Sherbrooke Geriatric University Institute, Sherbrooke, Canada. |
| Website | --- |
| Available | --- |
| Links | --- |
| DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT | |
| Type Of Measure | Questionnaire |
| Brief Description |
This questionnaire measures the degree of individual empowerment in relation to personal health care and services. The HCEQ measures three aspects of patient empowerment that had been proposed in the literature: degree of control, or consideration of who is involved in making decisions; involvement in interactions, or the ability and opportunity to communicate needs and initiate requests with a health-care provide ; and involvement in decisions, or actively obtaining the information necessary to make rational decisions. |
| Number of Items | 10 |
| Range | 0-10 |
| Responses options/scale |
No |
| Developed for | --- |
| PRACTICAL APPLICATION | |
| Method of administration | Interviewer/assessor |
| Recommendations to score |
Each item had two response scales successively describing one’s perception of control in regard to health care and services received while motivation was evaluated by the importance of being empowered. First, the subject had to answer the following question: ‘‘Did you feel that . . .’’ (for example, ‘‘. . . you asked for explanations’’). The answers to this question were based on the following fourpoint Likert scale: 1 not at all, 2 somewhat, 3 very much, and 4 extremely. The second question, related to the same element in regard to health care and services, evaluated the level of motivation: ‘‘How important is it that . . .’’ (for example, ‘‘. . . you ask for explanations’’). In this case, the four-point response scale was 1 not important at all, 2 slightly important, 3 very important, and 4 extremely important. |
| Score Interpretation | 0 represented high difficulty understanding and 10 represented no difficulty understanding |
| Cut-off points | Positive agreement between the interviewers (average of 8–10), a qualified agreement (average of 6–8), a negative agreement (average less than 6), and an absence of agreement when there was great variability between evaluators |
| Cut-off points applied to | --- |
| Smallest detectable change if described | --- |
| Smallest detectable change applied to | --- |
| Completion time by the patient | - minutes |
| Scoring time by the assessor | - minutes |
| Training to score | Not necessary |
| Strengths | Easy to use, Useful in clinical practice & research |
| Limitations | --- |
| OTHER COMMENTS | |
| Other Comments | --- |