Detailled Information

Name of the Instrument/Tool American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score
First Description

Richards RR, An KN, Bigliani LU, Friedman RJ, Gartsman GM, Gristina AG, Iannotti JP, Mow VC, Sidles JA, Zuckerman JD. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994 Nov;3(6):347-52.

Year 1994
Domains
Concept of constructs Health related quality of life
Population/Disease Disease specific
Originally developed for Shoulder pathology
Other rheumatic diseases
where can be applied (only if validated)
---
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases No
Language: Originally published in English
Available in Language German, Portuguese, Spanish, Finnish
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
Author/s Richards RR, An KN, Bigliani LU, Friedman RJ, Gartsman GM, Gristina AG, Iannotti JP, Mow VC, Sidles JA, Zuckerman JD.
Title A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function
Journal J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994 Nov;3(6):347-52.
Year 1994
Vol 3
Num 6
Pages 347-52
Country USA
Language English
Other references of interest
Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22588743/
Brief Description

Measures of adult shoulder function: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and its short version (QuickDASH), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Society standardized shoulder assessment form, Constant (Murley) Score (CS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI)

Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33895303/
Brief Description

The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score has excellent correlation with the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis score

Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32706731/
Brief Description

Validation of a Mobile Version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form: An Observational Randomized Crossover Trial

Instrument/Tool Translations References
Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33317701/
Brief Description

Spanish translation and cross-language validation of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form

Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20554427/
Brief Description

The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Elbow Questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation into German and evaluation of its psychometric properties 

Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21125153/
Brief Description

Translation and cultural adaptation to the portuguese language of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder assessment form (ASES) for evaluation of shoulder function

DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION
Correspondence to Robin Richards
E-Mail ases@aaos.org
Address American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, 6300. North River Road, Suite 727
Website ---
Available ---
Links ---
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Type Of Measure Score
Brief Description

Patient self-assessment section (patient ASES [pASES]) and a section to be completed by the examiner (clinical ASES [cASES] or, more precisely, ASES-examiner). The pASES form is divided into 3 sections: pain (6 items), instability (2 items), and ADL (10 items for both sides each). The cASES has 4 parts (each for left and right): range of motion (5 items, each passive and active), signs (11 items), strength (5 items), and instability (8 items + 1 open question).

Number of Items 17
Range 0-100
Responses options/scale Yes
See "Recommendations to score"
Developed for Both
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Method of administration Self-administered
Recommendations to score

Binary (yes/no) answers for pain and instability, visual analog scales (VAS) for pain and instability (where 0  = best and 10= worst), and 4-point ordinal Likert scale for function (where 0 = unable to do, 1 = very difficult, 2 = somewhat difficult, and 3= not difficult).

The pASES total score  = ((10 - VAS pain) x 5) + (5/3  x sum of ADL items). The instability items and the remaining 5 pain items do not contribute to the pASES total score. Determination of the cASES was not described originally; 1 solution, using 2 of 3 of the completed items to determine the scores, is given in 1 study

Score Interpretation 0 indicates a worse shoulder condition and 100 indicates a better shoulder condition.
Cut-off points ---
Cut-off points applied to ---
Smallest detectable change if described ---
Smallest detectable change applied to ---
Completion time by the patient - minutes
Scoring time by the assessor - minutes
Training to score Not necessary
Strengths Useful in clinical practice & research, Easy to use
Limitations ---
OTHER COMMENTS
Other Comments

There was a high agreement between the paper and mobile versions of the ASES questionnaire (ICC=0.979, 95% CI 0.943-0.987; P<.001). The mean difference between the scores of the mobile and paper versions was 1.0, and only 1/46 (2%) had a difference greater than the minimal clinically important difference of 12 points. About 75% of patients preferred the mobile version to the paper version.