| Name of the Instrument/Tool | American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score |
| First Description |
Richards RR, An KN, Bigliani LU, Friedman RJ, Gartsman GM, Gristina AG, Iannotti JP, Mow VC, Sidles JA, Zuckerman JD. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994 Nov;3(6):347-52. |
| Year | 1994 |
| Domains | |
| Concept of constructs | Health related quality of life |
| Population/Disease | Disease specific |
| Originally developed for | Shoulder pathology |
| Other rheumatic diseases where can be applied (only if validated) |
--- |
| Additional population with no rheumatic diseases |
No |
| Language: Originally published in | English |
| Available in Language | German, Portuguese, Spanish, Finnish |
| REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION | |
| Author/s | Richards RR, An KN, Bigliani LU, Friedman RJ, Gartsman GM, Gristina AG, Iannotti JP, Mow VC, Sidles JA, Zuckerman JD. |
| Title | A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function |
| Journal | J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994 Nov;3(6):347-52. |
| Year | 1994 |
| Vol | 3 |
| Num | 6 |
| Pages | 347-52 |
| Country | USA |
| Language | English |
| Other references of interest | |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22588743/ |
| Brief Description |
Measures of adult shoulder function: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and its short version (QuickDASH), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Society standardized shoulder assessment form, Constant (Murley) Score (CS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33895303/ |
| Brief Description |
The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score has excellent correlation with the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis score |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32706731/ |
| Brief Description |
Validation of a Mobile Version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form: An Observational Randomized Crossover Trial |
| Instrument/Tool Translations References | |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33317701/ |
| Brief Description |
Spanish translation and cross-language validation of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20554427/ |
| Brief Description |
The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Elbow Questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation into German and evaluation of its psychometric properties |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21125153/ |
| Brief Description |
Translation and cultural adaptation to the portuguese language of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder assessment form (ASES) for evaluation of shoulder function |
| DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION | |
| Correspondence to | Robin Richards |
| ases@aaos.org | |
| Address | American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, 6300. North River Road, Suite 727 |
| Website | --- |
| Available | --- |
| Links | --- |
| DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT | |
| Type Of Measure | Score |
| Brief Description |
Patient self-assessment section (patient ASES [pASES]) and a section to be completed by the examiner (clinical ASES [cASES] or, more precisely, ASES-examiner). The pASES form is divided into 3 sections: pain (6 items), instability (2 items), and ADL (10 items for both sides each). The cASES has 4 parts (each for left and right): range of motion (5 items, each passive and active), signs (11 items), strength (5 items), and instability (8 items + 1 open question). |
| Number of Items | 17 |
| Range | 0-100 |
| Responses options/scale |
Yes See "Recommendations to score" |
| Developed for | Both |
| PRACTICAL APPLICATION | |
| Method of administration | Self-administered |
| Recommendations to score |
Binary (yes/no) answers for pain and instability, visual analog scales (VAS) for pain and instability (where 0 = best and 10= worst), and 4-point ordinal Likert scale for function (where 0 = unable to do, 1 = very difficult, 2 = somewhat difficult, and 3= not difficult). The pASES total score = ((10 - VAS pain) x 5) + (5/3 x sum of ADL items). The instability items and the remaining 5 pain items do not contribute to the pASES total score. Determination of the cASES was not described originally; 1 solution, using 2 of 3 of the completed items to determine the scores, is given in 1 study |
| Score Interpretation | 0 indicates a worse shoulder condition and 100 indicates a better shoulder condition. |
| Cut-off points | --- |
| Cut-off points applied to | --- |
| Smallest detectable change if described | --- |
| Smallest detectable change applied to | --- |
| Completion time by the patient | - minutes |
| Scoring time by the assessor | - minutes |
| Training to score | Not necessary |
| Strengths | Useful in clinical practice & research, Easy to use |
| Limitations | --- |
| OTHER COMMENTS | |
| Other Comments |
There was a high agreement between the paper and mobile versions of the ASES questionnaire (ICC=0.979, 95% CI 0.943-0.987; P<.001). The mean difference between the scores of the mobile and paper versions was 1.0, and only 1/46 (2%) had a difference greater than the minimal clinically important difference of 12 points. About 75% of patients preferred the mobile version to the paper version. |