Detailled Information

Name of the Instrument/Tool ENT Activity Score (ENTAS)
First Description

Garske U, Haack A, Beltrán O, Flores-Suárez LF, Bremer JP, Lamprecht P, Hedderich J, Quetz J, Gross WL, Ambrosch P, Laudien M. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of endonasal activity estimation in granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener´s). Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012 Jan-Feb;30(1 Suppl 70):S22-8. Epub 2012 May 10. PMID: 22640648.

Year 2012
Domains
Concept of constructs ENT assessment
Population/Disease Disease specific
Originally developed for ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV)
Other rheumatic diseases
where can be applied (only if validated)
---
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases No
Language: Originally published in English
Available in Language ---
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
Author/s Garske U, Haack A, Beltrán O, Flores-Suárez LF, Bremer JP, Lamprecht P, Hedderich J, Quetz J, Gross WL, Ambrosch P, Laudien M.
Title Intra- and inter-rater reliability of endonasal activity estimation in granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener´s).
Journal Clin Exp Rheumatol.
Year 2012
Vol 30
Num 1
Pages 22-8
Country Germany
Language English
Other references of interest
Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28466803/
Brief Description

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28466803/

Instrument/Tool Translations References
No other References.
DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION
Correspondence to Ulrike Garske
E-Mail ulrikeglowienka@gmx.de
Address Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Website ---
Available ---
Links ---
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Type Of Measure Score
Brief Description

The ENT activity score (ENTAS) aims for standardizing ENT assessment, including activity and damage to the inner and external nose, paranasal sinus, ear, larynx and subglottis.

Number of Items 35
Range -
Responses options/scale Yes
Yes/No
Developed for Research, Clinical practice
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Method of administration Physician
Recommendations to score

GPA/ENT activity was evaluated in dichotomy (yes/no) and grading (none/mild/moderate/ high).

Score Interpretation -
Cut-off points -
Cut-off points applied to ---
Smallest detectable change if described -
Smallest detectable change applied to ---
Completion time by the patient - minutes
Scoring time by the assessor - minutes
Training to score Not necessary
Strengths Useful in clinical practice & research
Limitations Ceiling effect
OTHER COMMENTS
Other Comments

A modifified ENT assessment score based on anamnesis, endoscopic and diagnostic data was published, named ENTAS 2, that showed high intra-rater reliability in damage evaluation (87.8%, κ=0.74).