Detailled Information

Name of the Instrument/Tool Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised (HVLT-R)
First Description

Benedict RHB, Schretlen D, Groninger L, Brandt J. Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – Revised: normative data and analysis of inter-form and test-retest reliability. Clin Neuropsychol 1998;12:43–55

Year 1998
Domains
Concept of constructs Cognitive Impairment
Population/Disease Generic
Originally developed for ---
Other rheumatic diseases
where can be applied (only if validated)
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases Yes
Dementia
Language: Originally published in English
Available in Language Arabic, Norwegian, Romanian, Italian, Spanish, Polish, Swedish, German, Greek, Dutch, Portuguese, Hungarian, Japanese
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
Author/s Benedict RHB, Schretlen D, Groninger L, Brandt J
Title Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – Revised: normative data and analysis of inter-form and test-retest reliability
Journal Clin Neuropsychol
Year 1998
Vol 12
Num ---
Pages 43–55
Country USA
Language English
Other references of interest
Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10726605/
Brief Description

Construct and concurrent validity of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-revised

Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18050187/
Brief Description

Impact of memory impairment on employment status in persons with systemic lupus erythematosus

Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33091255/
Brief Description

Measures of Cognition in Rheumatic Diseases

Instrument/Tool Translations References
Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33438193/
Brief Description

Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-revised: normalization and standardization for Spanish population

DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION
Correspondence to Ralph Hb Benedict
E-Mail benedict@buffalo.edu
Address Buffalo General Hospital, Suite E2, 100 High Street, Buffalo, New York, 14203, USA
Website ---
Available ---
Links ---
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Type Of Measure Performance-based instrument
Brief Description

The HVLT-R is a brief word-list screening test to assess verbal learning and memory and is intended for populations with Cognitive Impairment (CI).

The domains assessed include verbal learning efficiency, ability to access newly learned information, and retention

Number of Items Each form is a list of 12 nouns with four words (from three semantic categories). The semantic categories differ across the six forms.
Range ---
Responses options/scale Yes
and recognition.
Developed for Research, Clinical practice
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Method of administration Interviewer/assessor, Self-administered
Recommendations to score

The administrator reads the list of 12 words aloud and the participant is asked to freely recall them immediately. In total, the list is read three times, with a free recall trial following each time the list is read. A 25-minute delayed free recall trial is administered, followed by a yes/no recognition trial. The participant indicates whether the word presented is a target word or not.

The words recalled for each trial are recorded by the administrator. Trials 1 to 3 are the learning trials and trial 4 is the delayed recall trial. Raw scores are derived from total recall, delayed recall, retention (percentage retained), and a recognition discrimination index. The total recall score is the sum of trials 1, 2, and 3. The learning measure is calculated as the higher of trial 2 recall and trial 3 recall minus the trial 1 recall. The percentage retained is calculated as the better of trials 2 and 3 divided by the trial 4 recall score, multiplied by 100. For recognition, the total number of true and false positives is recorded, and a recognition discrimination index is calculated (true positives − false positives). PAR, Inc, also offers scoring software following the entry of raw scores.

Score Interpretation Raw scores are translated to T or Z scores with percentiles for comparison with normative data. The manual contains guidelines on how to interpret results
Cut-off points Impairment was assigned as below or equal to −1.5 SD below the population norm for total recall or delayed recall
Cut-off points applied to ---
Smallest detectable change if described ---
Smallest detectable change applied to ---
Completion time by the patient 5-10 minutes
Scoring time by the assessor <5 minutes
Training to score Not necessary
Strengths Widely used
Limitations ---
OTHER COMMENTS
Other Comments ---