| Name of the Instrument/Tool | Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised (HVLT-R) |
| First Description |
Benedict RHB, Schretlen D, Groninger L, Brandt J. Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – Revised: normative data and analysis of inter-form and test-retest reliability. Clin Neuropsychol 1998;12:43–55 |
| Year | 1998 |
| Domains | |
| Concept of constructs | Cognitive Impairment |
| Population/Disease | Generic |
| Originally developed for | --- |
| Other rheumatic diseases where can be applied (only if validated) |
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) |
| Additional population with no rheumatic diseases |
Yes Dementia |
| Language: Originally published in | English |
| Available in Language | Arabic, Norwegian, Romanian, Italian, Spanish, Polish, Swedish, German, Greek, Dutch, Portuguese, Hungarian, Japanese |
| REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION | |
| Author/s | Benedict RHB, Schretlen D, Groninger L, Brandt J |
| Title | Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – Revised: normative data and analysis of inter-form and test-retest reliability |
| Journal | Clin Neuropsychol |
| Year | 1998 |
| Vol | 12 |
| Num | --- |
| Pages | 43–55 |
| Country | USA |
| Language | English |
| Other references of interest | |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10726605/ |
| Brief Description |
Construct and concurrent validity of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-revised |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18050187/ |
| Brief Description |
Impact of memory impairment on employment status in persons with systemic lupus erythematosus |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33091255/ |
| Brief Description |
Measures of Cognition in Rheumatic Diseases |
| Instrument/Tool Translations References | |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33438193/ |
| Brief Description |
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-revised: normalization and standardization for Spanish population |
| DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION | |
| Correspondence to | Ralph Hb Benedict |
| benedict@buffalo.edu | |
| Address | Buffalo General Hospital, Suite E2, 100 High Street, Buffalo, New York, 14203, USA |
| Website | --- |
| Available | --- |
| Links | --- |
| DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT | |
| Type Of Measure | Performance-based instrument |
| Brief Description |
The HVLT-R is a brief word-list screening test to assess verbal learning and memory and is intended for populations with Cognitive Impairment (CI). The domains assessed include verbal learning efficiency, ability to access newly learned information, and retention |
| Number of Items | Each form is a list of 12 nouns with four words (from three semantic categories). The semantic categories differ across the six forms. |
| Range | --- |
| Responses options/scale |
Yes and recognition. |
| Developed for | Research, Clinical practice |
| PRACTICAL APPLICATION | |
| Method of administration | Interviewer/assessor, Self-administered |
| Recommendations to score |
The administrator reads the list of 12 words aloud and the participant is asked to freely recall them immediately. In total, the list is read three times, with a free recall trial following each time the list is read. A 25-minute delayed free recall trial is administered, followed by a yes/no recognition trial. The participant indicates whether the word presented is a target word or not. The words recalled for each trial are recorded by the administrator. Trials 1 to 3 are the learning trials and trial 4 is the delayed recall trial. Raw scores are derived from total recall, delayed recall, retention (percentage retained), and a recognition discrimination index. The total recall score is the sum of trials 1, 2, and 3. The learning measure is calculated as the higher of trial 2 recall and trial 3 recall minus the trial 1 recall. The percentage retained is calculated as the better of trials 2 and 3 divided by the trial 4 recall score, multiplied by 100. For recognition, the total number of true and false positives is recorded, and a recognition discrimination index is calculated (true positives − false positives). PAR, Inc, also offers scoring software following the entry of raw scores. |
| Score Interpretation | Raw scores are translated to T or Z scores with percentiles for comparison with normative data. The manual contains guidelines on how to interpret results |
| Cut-off points | Impairment was assigned as below or equal to −1.5 SD below the population norm for total recall or delayed recall |
| Cut-off points applied to | --- |
| Smallest detectable change if described | --- |
| Smallest detectable change applied to | --- |
| Completion time by the patient | 5-10 minutes |
| Scoring time by the assessor | <5 minutes |
| Training to score | Not necessary |
| Strengths | Widely used |
| Limitations | --- |
| OTHER COMMENTS | |
| Other Comments | --- |