Detailled Information

Name of the Instrument/Tool Patient Experienced Symptom State (PESS)
First Description

Duarte C, Santos E, da Silva JAP, Kristianslund EK, Kvien TK, Dougados M, de Wit M, Gossec L, Heiberg T. The Patient Experienced Symptom State (PESS): a patient-reported global outcome measure that may better reflect disease remission status. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Nov 1;59(11):3458-3467. 

Year 2020
Domains
Concept of constructs Disease activity
Population/Disease Disease specific
Originally developed for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
Other rheumatic diseases
where can be applied (only if validated)
---
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases No
Language: Originally published in English
Available in Language French, Norwegian
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
Author/s Duarte C, Santos E, da Silva JAP, Kristianslund EK, Kvien TK, Dougados M, de Wit M, Gossec L, Heiberg T.
Title The Patient Experienced Symptom State (PESS): a patient-reported global outcome measure that may better reflect disease remission status.
Journal Rheumatology (Oxford).
Year 2020
Vol 59
Num 11
Pages 3458-67
Country Multinational
Language English
Other references of interest
Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32375173/
Brief Description

Patient Experienced Symptom State (PESS) development study

Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32375173/
Brief Description

The Patient Experienced Symptom State (PESS): a patient-reported global outcome measure that may better reflect disease remission status

Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35482485/
Brief Description

Patient Experienced Symptom State in rheumatoid arthritis: sensitivity to change in disease activity and impact.

Instrument/Tool Translations References
No other References.
DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION
Correspondence to Cátia Duarte
E-Mail catiacmduarte@gmail.com
Address Department of Rheumatology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra.
Website ---
Available ---
Links ---
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Type Of Measure Score
Brief Description

The PESS assesses disease activity status and impact of disease through the question ‘Consider how your rheumatic disease has affected you during the last week. If you remain in the coming months as you have been the last week, how would you rate your condition?’, offering a 5-level Likert scale response.

Number of Items 1
Range 0-5
Responses options/scale Yes
5 responses: "very bad"-"very good"
Developed for Research, Clinical practice
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Method of administration Self-administered
Recommendations to score

5-level Likert scale response.

Score Interpretation ‘very bad’, ‘bad’, ‘acceptable’, ‘good’ and ‘very good’
Cut-off points Cut-off values corresponding to 'good' and 'very good' PESS states were in the range of low disease activity/remission for DAS28, DCAI and SDAI
Cut-off points applied to Research, Routine care
Smallest detectable change if described ---
Smallest detectable change applied to ---
Completion time by the patient <1 minutes
Scoring time by the assessor <1 minutes
Training to score Not necessary
Strengths Useful in clinical practice & research, Easy to use
Limitations ---
OTHER COMMENTS
Other Comments

The results of the seminal study indicated that a ‘very good’ PESS status corresponds to low impact of disease on mHAQ (0) and each of the seven domains of health addressed by the RAID score (scores <1). This was further supported by the high areas under the curve (>80%) for all outcome measures, suggesting that PESS adequately captures the overall impact of RA. These findings suggest that PESS could be more suitable to capture the overall impact of RA than PGA, which is more influenced by pain, fatigue and function than by disease activity.