Detailled Information

Name of the Instrument/Tool Valued Life Activity scale (VLA) & Shortened version of the VLA scale (S-VLA)
First Description

Katz PP, Morris A, Yelin EH. Prevalence and predictors of disability in valued life activities among individuals with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Jun;65(6):763-9.

Year 2006
Domains
Concept of constructs Activities of daily living
Population/Disease Disease specific
Originally developed for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
Other rheumatic diseases
where can be applied (only if validated)
---
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases Yes
COPD
Language: Originally published in English
Available in Language Swedish
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
Author/s Katz PP, Morris A, Yelin EH
Title Prevalence and predictors of disability in valued life activities among individuals with rheumatoid arthritis
Journal Ann Rheum Dis
Year 2006
Vol 65
Num 6
Pages 763-9
Country USA
Language English
Other references of interest
Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21905253/
Brief Description

Development and validation of a short form of the valued life activities disability questionnaire for rheumatoid arthritis.

Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19952768/
Brief Description

Disability in valued life activities among individuals with COPD and other respiratory conditions

Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33091247/
Brief Description

Measures of Participation in Persons With Musculoskeletal Conditions

Instrument/Tool Translations References
Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26603893/
Brief Description

Validation and internal consistency of the Swedish version of the Valued Life Activities scale

DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION
Correspondence to Patricia P Katz
E-Mail patti.katz@ucsf.edu
Address University of California, San Franciso, Department of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Website ---
Available ---
Links ---
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Type Of Measure Scale
Brief Description

The original version of the VLA was developed and validated in the United States. The aim was to assess participation in valued life activities. Valued life activities were defied as activities that the person actually does and that are important.

The questionnaire includes activities for which one can report difficulty performing an activity, whether an activity is relevant or not, and how important the activity is to the individual. The 26 activities represent a wide spectrum of participation and were derived theoretically from the disablement process model and from interviews with patients with rheumatoid arthritis who stated that activities were often affected by the disease. They have also been linked to the activities covered in ICF chapters two through nine. The activities could be clustered in three different types of activities: obligatory (eg, self-care), committed, or discretionary activities (eg, recreation and social participation). Obligatory activities are those required for survival and self-sufficiency, including activities of daily living, such as hygiene and self-care, walking inside, walking outside, and using transportation or driving. Committed activities are those associated with one's principal productive social roles, such as paid work, household responsibilities, and child and family care. Discretionary activities are activities such as socializing, exercise, engaging in leisure-time activities and pastimes, participating in religious or spiritual activities, pursuing volunteer work or hobbies, or other activities that individuals engage in for relaxation and pleasure.

Number of Items VLA: 26; S-VLA: 14
Range ---
Responses options/scale Yes
Activities that are scored as applicable and important are rated according to difficulty by using a four-point Likert scale in which 0 represents no difficulty and 3 represents inablity to perform.
Developed for ---
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Method of administration Interviewer/assessor, Self-administered
Recommendations to score

Activities that are scored as applicable and important are rated according to difficulty by using a four-point Likert scale in which 0 represents no difficulty and 3 represents inablity to perform. Both help from another person and use of accommodation is scored as “yes” or “no” in each performance-rated activity.

Three types of VLA summary scores can be calculated: the number of activities that individuals are completely unable to do because of their condition (unable), the number of activities that are affected by the condition (unable to do or any level of difficulty; affected), and the average difficulty score (difficulty). All scores are calculated for the total VLA and for the obligatory, committed, and discretionary subscales. Activities that participants deem unimportant to them or that they did not do for reasons unrelated to rheumatoid arthritis are not rated and are not included in scoring. Use of help from another person or use of accommodations are not included in the score

Score Interpretation A higher score indicates more participation restrictions
Cut-off points ---
Cut-off points applied to ---
Smallest detectable change if described ---
Smallest detectable change applied to ---
Completion time by the patient 15 minutes
Scoring time by the assessor - minutes
Training to score Not necessary
Strengths Easy to use
Limitations ---
OTHER COMMENTS
Other Comments ---