Detailled Information

Name of the Instrument/Tool Checklist Individual Strength Fatigue (CIS-fatigue)
First Description

Vercoulen JH, Swanink CM, Fennis JF, et  al. Dimensional assessment of chronic fatigue syndrome. J Psychosom Res 1994;38:383–92

Year 1994
Domains
Concept of constructs Fatigue
Population/Disease Generic
Originally developed for ---
Other rheumatic diseases
where can be applied (only if validated)
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Fibromyalgia (FM)
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases No
Language: Originally published in English
Available in Language Swedish, Korean, Dutch
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
Author/s Vercoulen JH, Swanink CM, Fennis JF, Galama JM, van der Meer JW, Bleijenberg G
Title Dimensional assessment of chronic fatigue syndrome
Journal J Psychosom Res
Year 1994
Vol 38
Num 5
Pages 383-92
Country The Netherlands
Language English
Other references of interest
Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20353956/
Brief Description

Physical and psychosocial correlates of severe fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis

Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10769302/
Brief Description

Fatigue among working people: validity of a questionnaire measure

Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33091265/
Brief Description

Measures of Fatigue in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases: A Critical Review

Instrument/Tool Translations References
Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20345240/
Brief Description

Measuring fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis: reproducibility, responsiveness and concurrent validity of three Dutch self-report questionnaires

DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION
Correspondence to Jan H Vercoulen
E-Mail j.vercoulen@mps.umcn.nl
Address Department of Medical Psychology, University Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Website ---
Available ---
Links ---
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Type Of Measure Questionnaire
Brief Description

CIS-fatigue is an eight-item subscale of CIS that measures subjective fatigue.

The CIS consists of 20 statements on fatigue-related problems. These components were easy to interpret and were called subjective fatigue (eight items), concentration (five items), motivation (four items), and physical activity (three items). Twenty items provide a total CIS20R score, including four subscale scores for subjective fatigue experience (eight items), concentration (five items), motivation (four items), and physical activity levels (three items). The CIS-fatigue uses eight items. Each item is scored on a seven-point Likert scale.

Number of Items 8 item
Range 8-56
Responses options/scale No
Developed for ---
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Method of administration Self-administered
Recommendations to score

The CIS consists of 20 statements on fatigue-related problems respondents might have experienced in the past 2 weeks. A Likert scoring scheme is used. With each statement, respondents indicate a score from 1 to 7, indicating either yes, that is true or no, that is not true.

Score Interpretation Higher punctuation indicates higher fatigue
Cut-off points Below 27 = normal experience of fatigue, 27-34 = moderate fatigue, >35 = severe fatigue(persistent severe fatigue)
Cut-off points applied to ---
Smallest detectable change if described ---
Smallest detectable change applied to ---
Completion time by the patient - minutes
Scoring time by the assessor - minutes
Training to score Not necessary
Strengths Useful in clinical practice & research
Limitations ---
OTHER COMMENTS
Other Comments ---