Detailled Information

Name of the Instrument/Tool Ocular Staining Score (OSS)
First Description

Whitcher JP, Shiboski CH, Shiboski SC, et al; Sjögren's International Collaborative Clinical Alliance Research Groups. A simplified quantitative method for assessing keratoconjunctivitis sicca from the Sjögren's Syndrome International Registry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar;149(3):405-15. 

Year 2010
Domains
Concept of constructs Symptom severity
Population/Disease Disease specific
Originally developed for Sjögren's syndrome
Other rheumatic diseases
where can be applied (only if validated)
---
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases No
Language: Originally published in English
Available in Language ---
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
Author/s Whitcher JP, Shiboski CH, Shiboski SC, Heidenreich AM, Kitagawa K, Zhang S, Hamann S, Larkin G, McNamara NA, Greenspan JS, Daniels TE; Sjögren's International Collaborative Clinical Alliance Research Groups
Title A simplified quantitative method for assessing keratoconjunctivitis sicca from the Sjögren's Syndrome International Registry
Journal Am J Ophthalmol
Year 2010
Vol 149
Num 3
Pages 405-15
Country USA
Language English
Other references of interest
Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31453437/
Brief Description

Reproducibility of Ocular Surface Staining in the Assessment of Sjögren Syndrome-Related Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca: Implications on Disease Classification.

Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26356755/
Brief Description

Serologic Markers Are Associated With Ocular Staining Score in Primary Sjögren Syndrome

Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33091252/
Brief Description

Outcome Measures in Primary Sjögren's Syndrome

Instrument/Tool Translations References
No other References.
DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION
Correspondence to Caroline H Shiboski
E-Mail caro@itsa.ucsf.edu
Address University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif, 94143-0422, USA
Website ---
Available ---
Links ---
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Type Of Measure Score
Brief Description

The OSS is an ocular surface staining score used to objectively assess the severity of keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS).

The OSS includes two domains: the corneal fluorescein staining pattern and the conjunctival lissamine green staining pattern.

Administration of the OSS can be performed by experienced ophthalmologists or optometrists.

Number of Items 2
Range 0-12
Responses options/scale No
Developed for ---
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Method of administration Physician
Recommendations to score

The total OSS for each eye is the summation of the fluorescein score for the cornea and the lissamine green scores for the nasal and temporal bulbar conjunctivae.

-Corneal fluorescein staining pattern: Each cornea is examined. Punctate epithelial erosions (PEEs) are counted and scored as follows: no PEE, score is 0; 1 to 5 PEEs, score is 1; 6 to 30 PEEs, score is 2; and more than 30 PEEs, score is 3. An additional point is added if 1) the PEE occurred in the central portion of the cornea, 2) one or more filaments are seen, or 3) one or more patches of confluent staining are found anywhere on the cornea. The total score for the cornea is the sum. The maximum possible score for each cornea is 6.

-Conjunctival lissamine green staining pattern. The interpalpebral bulbar conjunctivae are examined after staining. Nasal and temporal conjunctivae are graded separately, with a maximum score of 3 for each area or a total maximum score of 6 for each eye. Grade 0 is defined as 0 to 9 dots; grade 1, 10 to 32 dots; grade 2, 33 to 100 dots; and grade 3, more than 100 dots

Score Interpretation Higher scores indicate higher severity of keratoconjunctivitis sicca
Cut-off points Abnormal OSS greater or equal to 3. Current accepted threshold is greater than or equal to 5
Cut-off points applied to ---
Smallest detectable change if described ---
Smallest detectable change applied to ---
Completion time by the patient - minutes
Scoring time by the assessor 20 minutes
Training to score Experienced ophthalmologists
Strengths Useful in clinical practice & research
Limitations Complex scoring
OTHER COMMENTS
Other Comments ---