| MEASUREMENT PROPERTIES | |
| Limitations | <5 European languages (English) |
| Observations | |
| 1. RELIABILITY | |
| A. Internal Consistency | Tested |
| Cronbach's (Describe) |
Cronbach’s α = 0.99. |
| B. Reliability intraobserver or test-retest | Tested |
| Continuous scores: intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) Dichotomus: Cohen kappa (Describe) |
The consistency of the ratings of worst severity for the fatigue items in the long form between 0 and 24 hours appeared to be slightly lower for RA, with correlation coefficients of 0.52 to 0.72, than for the other two conditions (SLE: 0.69-0.89; pSS: 0.67-0.79) and healthy controls (0.64-0.81). The rated severity of the problem at worst was greater on average at 24 hours than 0 hours for all the fatigue terms. The repeatability over a 24-hour period of each of the three grouped symptom severity ratings in the domain of ocular dryness in the PROFAD-SSI-SF was high in each diagnostic group, with mean (+SD) percentage correlation coefficients of 92 (+2) in pSS, 91 (+5) in SLE, and 90 (+11) in RA, but was somewhat lower in controls (84 (+15)). Also, in oral dryness, the rated severity of the four grouped symptoms was consistent over 24 hours in all groups. The repeatability over 24 hours of the severity of a grouping of all the symptoms of systemic discomfort and/or arthralgia was high in all groups except RA, with mean percentage correlation coefficients of 92 in pSS, 94 in SLE, 79 in RA, and 92 in healthy controls. |
| C. Reliability interobserver or Measurement error | Not Tested |
| Standard error of measurement (SEM), smallest detectable change (SDC) or Limits of agreement (LoA) (Describe) |
|
| 2. VALIDITY | |
| A. Content validity: face validity | Tested |
| Expert opinion (relevance and comprehensiveness) (Describe) |
The PROFAD-SSI-SF was initially validated in a multicenter (12 participating sites) UK cohort that included 130 patients with pSS, 93 patients with SLE, 83 patients with RA, and 103 health community controls . The aim of these studies was to evaluate psychometric properties (construct validity, responsiveness, and reliability) and compare them with those of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Survey (MOS SF-36) and World Health Organization Quality of Life–Brief Version (WHOQoL BREV) questionnaires. All scores had an excellent reliability. |
| B. Construct Validity: Structural validity |
Tested |
| Hypotheses-testing | Tested |
| Cross-cultural validity | Not Tested |
| Brief Description |
Factor analysis confirmed the previous domain structure. Spearman’s correlation between the domains of the long and short forms was between 0.779 and 0.996. |
| C. Criterion validity | Not Tested |
| Comparison with a 'gold standard' Continuous scores: correlations, ROC curves Dichotomus: Sensitivity & Specificity (Describe) |
|