| Name of the Instrument/Tool | British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 (BILAG 2004) |
| First Description |
Isenberg DA, Rahman A, Allen E, et al. BILAG 2004. Development and initial validation of an updated version of the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group's disease activity index for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 Jul;44(7):902-6 |
| Year | 2005 |
| Domains | |
| Concept of constructs | Disease activity |
| Population/Disease | Disease specific |
| Originally developed for | Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) |
| Other rheumatic diseases where can be applied (only if validated) |
--- |
| Additional population with no rheumatic diseases |
No |
| Language: Originally published in | English |
| Available in Language | --- |
| REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION | |
| Author/s | Isenberg DA, Rahman A, Allen E, Farewell V, Akil M, Bruce IN, D'Cruz D, Griffiths B, Khamashta M, Maddison P, McHugh N, Snaith M, Teh LS, Yee CS, Zoma A, Gordon C |
| Title | BILAG 2004. Development and initial validation of an updated version of the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group's disease activity index for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus |
| Journal | Rheumatology |
| Year | 2005 |
| Vol | 44 |
| Num | 7 |
| Pages | 902-6 |
| Country | UK |
| Language | English |
| Other references of interest | |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3271336/ |
| Brief Description |
Development and assessment of a computerized index of clinical disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Members of the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20181671/ |
| Brief Description |
Numerical scoring for the BILAG-2004 index |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33091256/ |
| Brief Description |
Measures of Adult Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Disease Activity and Damage |
| Instrument/Tool Translations References | |
| No other References. | |
| DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION | |
| Correspondence to | David A Isenberg |
| d.isenberg@ucl.ac.uk | |
| Address | Centre for Rheumatology, University College London, 4th Floor, Arthur Stanley House, 40-50 Tottenham Street, London W1T 4NJ, UK |
| Website | --- |
| Available | --- |
| Links | --- |
| DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT | |
| Type Of Measure | Composite Index |
| Brief Description |
The BILAG 2004 index is a transitional score to assess organ‐/system‐based activity due to lupus based on the physician's intent‐to‐treat premise. The BILAG 2004 index is a revision of the classic BILAG index published in 1988. This index comprises specific manifestations across nine organs/systems: constitutional, mucocutaneous, neuropsychiatric, musculoskeletal, cardiorespiratory, gastrointestinal, ophthalmic, renal, and hematological. |
| Number of Items | 97 items in the 9 different organs/systems and 4 additional items for calculating the glomerular filtration rate |
| Range | --- |
| Responses options/scale |
Yes Each item (assumed to be due to activity) is scored as follows: ND = not done, 0 = not present, 1 = improving, 2 = same, 3 = worse, and 4 = new, yes, or no |
| Developed for | --- |
| PRACTICAL APPLICATION | |
| Method of administration | Physician |
| Recommendations to score |
The BILAG 2004 index is completed by the physician and requires additional training on use of the glossary items and scoring scheme. Each item is scored as either ND or from 0 to 4. Scores are then converted into alphabetical scores (A‐E) for each system either through a computerized system or manually after training. Being category A (for activity): severe disease activity requiring systemic high‐dose oral glucocorticoids, systemic immunomodulators, or high‐dose anticoagulation; category B (for beware): moderate disease activity requiring systemic low‐dose oral glucocorticoids, intramuscular/intraarticular or soft tissue glucocorticoid injection, or topical glucocorticoids, topical immunomodulators, or antimalarials; and categories C (for contentment], D (for discount), and E (for never, ever active): mild disease, inactive disease but previously affected, and system never involved, respectively. |
| Score Interpretation | The numerical scoring system facilitates comparisons with global indices by converting the assessments so that A = 12 points, B = 8 points, C = 1 point, and D/E = 0 points |
| Cut-off points | --- |
| Cut-off points applied to | --- |
| Smallest detectable change if described | --- |
| Smallest detectable change applied to | --- |
| Completion time by the patient | 15 minutes |
| Scoring time by the assessor | 30 minutes |
| Training to score | Not necessary |
| Strengths | Useful in clinical practice & research |
| Limitations | --- |
| OTHER COMMENTS | |
| Other Comments | --- |