Detailled Information

Name of the Instrument/Tool University of California, Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale (UCLA-SRS)
First Description

Amstutz H, Sew Hoy A, Clarke I. UCLA anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1981:7–20.

Year 1981
Domains
Concept of constructs Physical function, Pain
Population/Disease Disease specific
Originally developed for Shoulder pathology
Other rheumatic diseases
where can be applied (only if validated)
---
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases No
Language: Originally published in English
Available in Language Italian, English, Portuguese
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
Author/s Amstutz H, Sew Hoy A, Clarke I.
Title UCLA anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.
Journal Clin Orthop Relat Res
Year 1981
Vol ---
Num ---
Pages 7-20
Country USA
Language English
Other references of interest
Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3771595/
Brief Description

Ellman H, Hanker G, Bayer M. Repair of the rotator cuff. End-result study of factors influencing reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986;68:1136–44.  A modified UCLA Scale that includes both self-assessment and clinician-assessed items to assess outcome from rotator cuff surgery was published in 1986.

Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18372196/
Brief Description

Coghlan JA, Bell SN, Forbes A, Buchbinder R. Comparison of self-administered University of California, Los Angeles, shoulder score with traditional University of California, Los Angeles, shoulder score completed by clinicians in assessing the outcome of rotator cuff surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008;17:564–9.  A self-reported version of the modified UCLA Scale that modified the two clinician-assessed items for self-report was published in 2008

Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33091271/
Brief Description

Buchbinder R, Ramiro S, Huang H, Gagnier JJ, Jia Y, Whittle SL. Measures of Adult Shoulder Function. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Oct;72 Suppl 10:250-293. doi: 10.1002/acr.24230. PMID: 33091271.

Instrument/Tool Translations References
Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22500061/
Brief Description

Marchese C, Cristalli G, Pichi B, Manciocco V, Mercante G, Pellini R, Marchesi P, Sperduti I, Ruscito P, Spriano G. Italian cross-cultural adaptation and validation of three different scales for the evaluation of shoulder pain and dysfunction after neck dissection: University of California - Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Scale, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and Simple Shoulder Test (SST). Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2012 Feb;32(1):12-7. PMID: 22500061; PMCID: PMC3324966.

Link https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0482-50042006000400003 …
Brief Description

Oku E, Andrade A, Stadiniky S, Carrera E, Tellini G. Translation and cultural Adaptation of the modified-University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale to Portuguese language. Rev Bras Reumatol 2006;46:246–52.

DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION
Correspondence to H Amstutz
E-Mail harlanamstutz@dochs.org
Address Joint Replacement Institute at Saint Vincent Medical Center, The S. Mark Taper Building, 2200 West Third Street, Suite 400, Los Angeles, CA 90057 USA
Website ---
Available Free of charge.
Links ---
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Type Of Measure Questionnaire
Brief Description

The UCLA Shoulder Score is one of the oldest shoulder PRO measures in use today, and is a jointly completed score, with both physician and patient completed portions. The original UCLA Scale was published in 1981 and includes the following three domains: pain, function, and muscle power and motion. The questionnaire is a combined objective and subjective survey that requires completion by both the doctor and patient. There has been published a modified UCLA Scale and a patient-reported UCLA Scale.

The number of items varies between three items (original UCLA Scale) and seven items (modified version with the addition of two new items for abduction). The most commonly used version (the modified UCLA Scale) and the patient-reported UCLA Scale both have five items.

Number of Items 3 (originaL)-7 (modified version)
Range 0-35
Responses options/scale Yes
Likert-scale
Developed for ---
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Method of administration Self-administered, Physician
Recommendations to score

All items have weighted scores out of 10, based on categorical responses; all three items are completed by the clinician, and each of the three items is scored out of a maximum of 10 points.

In the modified version, there are six similar response options for pain and function, although the numerical weightings differ; three items are completed by the patient (pain, function, and satisfaction), and two are completed by the clinician or observer (active forward flexion and strength of forward flexion).

In the modified patient-reported version, all items are completed by the patient.

Score Interpretation Higher scores indicate less pain, better function and more muscle power.
Cut-off points Modified UCLA Scale: 34 or 35 is considered excellent, 28 to 33 is considered good, 21 to 27 is considered fair, and 20 or less is considered poor
Cut-off points applied to ---
Smallest detectable change if described 0.90
Smallest detectable change applied to ---
Completion time by the patient - minutes
Scoring time by the assessor - minutes
Training to score Not necessary
Strengths Useful in clinical practice & research
Limitations ---
OTHER COMMENTS
Other Comments

Agreement between the modified UCLA Scale and the patient-reported UCLA Scale was shown. Acceptable agreement in a postoperative population of patients who had undergone either arthroscopic subacromial decompression or rotator cuff repair ( N = 100), with values as follows: ICC = 0.910 (95% CI 0.87-0.94) for the whole cohort, ICC = 0.951 (95% CI 0.92-0.97) for the cohort with subacromial decompression (n = 46), and ICC = 0.734 (95% CI 0.61-0.83) for the cohort with rotator cuff repair (n = 54).