Detailled Information

Name of the Instrument/Tool Hand Disability In Systemic Sclerosis Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU)
First Description

Mouthon L, Poiraudeau S, Vernon M, Papadakis K, Perchenet L, Khanna D. Psychometric validation of the Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU®) patient-reported outcome instrument. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020; 22(1):3.

Year 2020
Domains
Concept of constructs Functional status
Population/Disease Disease specific
Originally developed for Systemic sclerosis
Other rheumatic diseases
where can be applied (only if validated)
---
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases No
Language: Originally published in English
Available in Language French
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
Author/s Mouthon L, Poiraudeau S, Vernon M, Papadakis K, Perchenet L, Khanna D
Title Psychometric validation of the Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU®) patient-reported outcome instrument
Journal Arthritis Res Ther
Year 2020
Vol 22
Num 1
Pages 3
Country France
Language English
Other references of interest
Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33091259/
Brief Description

An Update of Outcome Measures in Systemic Sclerosis

Link https://acr.confex.com/acr/2011/webprogram/Paper20636.html
Brief Description

Development of the HDISS-DU scale (abstract)

Instrument/Tool Translations References
No other References.
DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION
Correspondence to Dinesh Khanna
E-Mail khannad@med.umich.edu
Address Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Scleroderma Program, Suite 7C27, 300 North Ingalls Street, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Website ---
Available ---
Links ---
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Type Of Measure Questionnaire
Brief Description

The HDISS-DU scale is DU questionnaire adapted from the 18-item Cochin Hand Functional Scale (CHFS) that measures the patient-reported functional limitations relating to SSc-DUs. Patients are asked to rate their ability to do various tasks over the last 7-day period.

Number of Items 24
Range 1 (without difficulty) to 6 (impossible to do)
Responses options/scale No
Developed for Research, Clinical practice
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Method of administration Self-administered
Recommendations to score

There are eight response options for each item. Two options share the same score of 5. An option of “did not do this activity in the past 7 days” is scored as missing.  The overall HDISS-DU score is calculated as the mean of non-missing item scores (with a missing data threshold of < 12 items). 

Score Interpretation Higher scores indicate higher limitations relating to SSc-DUs
Cut-off points The preliminary threshold for meaningful change was a 0.50 difference in HDISS-DU score
Cut-off points applied to ---
Smallest detectable change if described ---
Smallest detectable change applied to ---
Completion time by the patient - minutes
Scoring time by the assessor - minutes
Training to score Not necessary
Strengths Easy to use, Useful in clinical practice & research
Limitations ---
OTHER COMMENTS
Other Comments ---