Detailled Information

Name of the Instrument/Tool Ankylosing Spondylitis Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 (AS-AIMS2)
First Description

Guillemin F, Challier B, Urlacher F, Vançon G, Pourel J. Quality of life in ankylosing spondylitis: validation of the ankylosing spondylitis Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2, a modified Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales Questionnaire. Arthritis Care Res. 1999 Jun;12(3):157-62.

Year 1999
Domains
Concept of constructs Health related quality of life, Physical function
Population/Disease Disease specific
Originally developed for Ankylosing spondylitis (AS)
Other rheumatic diseases
where can be applied (only if validated)
---
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases No
Language: Originally published in English
Available in Language English
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
Author/s Guillemin F
Title Quality of life in ankylosing spondylitis: validation of the ankylosing spondylitis Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2, a modified Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales Questionnaire.
Journal Arthritis Care Res.
Year 1999
Vol 12
Num 3
Pages 157-62.
Country France
Language English and French
Other references of interest
Link http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7362665
Brief Description

Measuring health status in Arthritis: the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS) - original publication of AIMS, a disease-specific measure of physical, social, and emotional well-being designed as a measure of outcome in arthritis.

Link http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1731806
Brief Description

Development of a a revised and expanded Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS) Health Status Questionnaire – the AIMS2.

Link http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8838508
Brief Description

Development, validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 (AIMS2) to be used by French speaking populations.

Instrument/Tool Translations References
Link http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10513505
Brief Description

Quality of life in ankylosing spondylitis: validation of the ankylosing spondylitis Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2, a modified Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales Questionnaire. Published in English but developed and validated in French.

DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION
Correspondence to Dr. Robert F. Meenan AIMS2; Dr. Francis Guillemin AS-AIMS2
E-Mail rmwwnan@bu.edu AIMS2; guillemi@sante-pub.u-nancy.fr AS-AIMS2
Address Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St., T-C-306, Boston, MA 02118 AIMS2; Service d’Epidémiologie et Évaluation Cliniques, Hôpital Marin, 92 Avenue de Lattre de Tassigny, CO 34, 54035 Nancy, France. AS-AIMS2
Website ---
Available copyrighted
Links

The AIMS2 instrument is copyrighted. Any investigator who wishes to use AIMS2 must obtain written permission (contact: Dr Robert Meenan). The spine mobility dimension of the AS-AIMS2 can be found in the AS-AIMS2 publication (author: Dr Francis Guillemin).

DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Type Of Measure Questionnaire
Brief Description

The AIMS2 is a self-report health status questionnaire comprising 57 core items organized in 12 health dimensions, further aggregated into 5 components by averaging the scores of the corresponding dimensions, namely physical (mobility level, walking and bending, hand and finger function, arm function, self-care, household tasks), affect (level of tension, mood), symptoms (joint pain), role (work), and social interaction (social activities, support from family and friends).

The AS-AIMS2 added 6 new items to AIMS2. The 6 new items were gathered into a dimension labeled “spine mobility.” This dimension was composed of only 4 items if the patient did not drive a car. The sum of the 4 or 6 items was normalized to range from 0 to 10. It was added to the AIMS2 as a thirteenth dimension, i.e., a seventh dimension of the physical component.

Number of Items 63 items (61 items if patient does not drive a car)
Range Range is 0-10 for each section/dimention. Total health score 0-60.
Responses options/scale Yes
Each item is measured on a 5-level Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4.
Developed for Both
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Method of administration Self-administered
Recommendations to score

In each dimension and component, item values are summed, and the scores are standardized to a 0-10 scale using a standardization formula. The total health score is calculated by summing the standardized scores for mobility, physical and household activities, dexterity, pain, and depression.

Score Interpretation Higher scores indicate greater disability. Zero represents perfect health status, 10 (dimension score) and 60 (total health score) represent poor health status.
Cut-off points ---
Cut-off points applied to ---
Smallest detectable change if described ---
Smallest detectable change applied to ---
Completion time by the patient In the AIMS2 original study completion times averaged 23 minutes. Completion time is not described in the AS-AIMS study. minutes
Scoring time by the assessor - minutes
Training to score Minimal training is required for scoring. Users' guides are available. The assessor needs to be aware that the score for each section is standardized to a 0-10 scale using a standardization formula.
Strengths Useful in clinical practice & research
Limitations Copyrighted, Lengthy
OTHER COMMENTS
Other Comments ---