Detailled Information

Name of the Instrument/Tool International physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ)
First Description

Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95. doi: 

Year 2003
Domains
Concept of constructs Physical function
Population/Disease Generic
Originally developed for ---
Other rheumatic diseases
where can be applied (only if validated)
Ankylosing spondylitis (AS)
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases No
Language: Originally published in English
Available in Language Chinese, Danish, English, French, German, Greek, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish, Swedish, Turkish
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
Author/s Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P.
Title International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity.
Journal Med Sci Sports Exerc.
Year 2003
Vol 35
Num 8
Pages 1381-95
Country Australia
Language English
Other references of interest
Link https://arthritis-research.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.118 …
Brief Description

This study investigates the construct validity and test-retest reliability of the IPAQ in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15076800/
Brief Description

Reliability and validity of the IPAQ.

Instrument/Tool Translations References
Link https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221133551 …
Brief Description

The aim was to validate the long IPAQ in adults aged 18–84 in the German-, French- and Italian-speaking parts of Switzerland, focusing on differences between gender, age groups and language regions.

Link https://benthamopen.com/FULLTEXT/TOSSJ-10-239
Brief Description

Validation of the  Portuguese version of the IPAQ.

DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION
Correspondence to Adrian Bauman
E-Mail a.bauman@unsw.edu.au
Address Centre for Physical Activity and Health, Epidemiology Unit, Locked Mail Bag 7017, Liverpool NSW 1871, Australia
Website https://sites.google.com/site/theipaq/home
Available ---
Links ---
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Type Of Measure Questionnaire
Brief Description

The IPAQ questionnaires were created to assess physical activity. The purpose of the IPAQ is to provide a set of well-developed instruments that can be used internationally to obtain comparable estimates of this construct.

There are two versions of the questionnaire. The short version is suitable for use in national and regional surveillance systems and the long version provide more detailed information often required in research work or for evaluation purposes.
The original long form refers to an average week in the past month and comprises questions in the following domains: occupational, household and gardening, transport, and leisure time. Each of these domains provides a specific activity score calculated by multiplying the number of minutes per week of the performed activities with the accompanying mean metabolic equivalent (MET) value of these activities. 

Number of Items 27
Range ---
Responses options/scale No
Developed for ---
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Method of administration Self-administered
Recommendations to score

The total activity score was calculated by the sum of the different domain scores and was reported in MET-minutes/week. According to the IPAQ guidelines, data were excluded if the total minutes of activity per day exceeded 960 minutes or when values were missing. There is an scoring protocol to develop this process at 

 

Score Interpretation Three levels (categories) of physical activity are proposed, according to the level of physical activity: low, moderate or high
Cut-off points ---
Cut-off points applied to ---
Smallest detectable change if described ---
Smallest detectable change applied to ---
Completion time by the patient - minutes
Scoring time by the assessor - minutes
Training to score Not necessary
Strengths Useful in clinical practice & research
Limitations Complex scoring
OTHER COMMENTS
Other Comments ---