| Name of the Instrument/Tool | Ankylosing Spondylitis-specific Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES-AS) |
| First Description |
Sandhu, Jaswant & Packham, Jon & Healey, Emma & Jordan, Kelvin & Garratt, Andrew & Haywood, Kirstie. (2011). Evaluation of a modified Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale for an ankylosing spondylitis UK population. Clinical and experimental rheumatology. 29. 223-30. |
| Year | 2011 |
| Domains | |
| Concept of constructs | Self-management |
| Population/Disease | Disease specific |
| Originally developed for | Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) |
| Other rheumatic diseases where can be applied (only if validated) |
--- |
| Additional population with no rheumatic diseases |
No |
| Language: Originally published in | English |
| Available in Language | --- |
| REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION | |
| Author/s | Sandhu, Jaswant & Packham, Jon & Healey, Emma & Jordan, Kelvin & Garratt, Andrew & Haywood, Kirstie. |
| Title | Evaluation of a modified Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale for an ankylosing spondylitis UK population. |
| Journal | Clinical and experimental rheumatology. |
| Year | 2011 |
| Vol | 29 |
| Num | --- |
| Pages | 223-30 |
| Country | UK |
| Language | English |
| Other references of interest | |
| Link | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10204758 |
| Brief Description |
The relationship of arthritis self-efficacy to daily pain, daily mood, and daily pain coping in rheumatoid arthritis patients. |
| Link | https://europepmc.org/article/med/29573848 |
| Brief Description |
This SLR aimed to identify studies investigating measurement properties of PROMs for spondyloarthritis, and to evaluate their methodological quality and level of evidence relating to the measurement properties of PROMs. |
| Link | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4158258/ |
| Brief Description |
This study examined psychometric properties of the 8-item English version of the Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES-8) and differences in ASES-8 scores across sample subgroups. |
| Instrument/Tool Translations References | |
| No other References. | |
| DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION | |
| Correspondence to | J Sandhu |
| jsandhu@doctors.org.uk | |
| Address | Arthritis Research Campaign National Primary Care Centre, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK. |
| Website | --- |
| Available | --- |
| Links | --- |
| DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT | |
| Type Of Measure | Questionnaire |
| Brief Description |
The original ASES was developed to measure patients’ arthritis-specific self-efficacy, or patients’ beliefs that they could perform specific tasks or behaviors to cope with the consequences of arthritis. It remains the most widely used arthritis-specific measure. It measures three SM constructs: pain self-efficacy, function self-efficacy and other symptoms self-efficacy. 8-item version includes two items from the pain subscale, four items from the other symptoms subscale, and two new items that relate to preventing pain and fatigue from interfering with daily activities. The ASES refers throughout to arthritis. The symptoms that AS patients experience are usually related to the spine and less frequently to peripheral joints, raising concerns that AS patients may not feel that assessing only arthritis encompasses their experience of disease. Therefore direct use of the ASES in an AS population is not feasible. In view of this, a rephrase of the ASES to specifically assess the impact of AS was conducted. The ASES-AS is based on the 8-item ASES with minor alterations in phraseology. |
| Number of Items | 8 items |
| Range | 1-10 for each subscale |
| Responses options/scale |
Yes From ‘1 = very uncertain’ to ‘10 = very certain |
| Developed for | Clinical practice, Research |
| PRACTICAL APPLICATION | |
| Method of administration | Interviewer/assessor, Self-administered |
| Recommendations to score |
The score is the mean of the eight items. At least six items must be completed to obtain a score. |
| Score Interpretation | Higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy. |
| Cut-off points | --- |
| Cut-off points applied to | --- |
| Smallest detectable change if described | --- |
| Smallest detectable change applied to | --- |
| Completion time by the patient | <5 minutes |
| Scoring time by the assessor | - minutes |
| Training to score | Not necessary |
| Strengths | Easy to use, Useful in clinical practice & research |
| Limitations | Not widely used |
| OTHER COMMENTS | |
| Other Comments | --- |