Detailled Information

Name of the Instrument/Tool Lupus Patient-Reported Outcome Tool (LupusPRO)
First Description

Jolly M, Pickard AS, Block JA, Kumar RB, Mikolaitis RA, Wilke CT, et al. Disease-Specific Patient Reported Outcome Tools for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Semin Arthritis Rheum  2012 Aug;42(1):56-65

Year 2012
Domains
Concept of constructs Coping & helplessness, Health related quality of life, Satisfaction
Population/Disease Disease specific
Originally developed for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Other rheumatic diseases
where can be applied (only if validated)
---
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases No
Language: Originally published in English
Available in Language Chinese, English
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
Author/s Jolly M, Pickard AS, Block JA, Kumar RB, Mikolaitis RA, Wilke CT, et al
Title Disease-Specific Patient Reported Outcome Tools for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Journal Semin Arthritis Rheum
Year 2012
Vol 42
Num 1
Pages 56-65
Country USA
Language English
Other references of interest
No other References.
Instrument/Tool Translations References
Link https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25156199
Brief Description

LupusPRO was translated into "traditional" Chinese, followed by pretesting among native Cantonese Chinese speakers

DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION
Correspondence to Meenakshi Jolly
E-Mail Meenakshi_Jolly@rush.edu.
Address Section of Rheumatology, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 West Harrison Street, Suite 510, Chicago, IL 60612
Website ---
Available All rights reserved. Please contact the developer
Links ---
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Type Of Measure Questionnaire
Brief Description

Patient report outcome tool which includes both health and non-health-related quality of life. HRQOL domains included (1) lupus symptoms; (2) physical health (physical function, role physical); (3) pain–vitality; (4) emotional health (emotional function and role emotional); (5) body image; (6) cognition; (7) procreation; and (8) lupus medications. Non-HRQOL domains were (1) available social support and coping; (2) desires–goals; and (3) satisfaction with medical care

Number of Items 44
Range 0-100
Responses options/scale Yes
“Most of the time” & “All of the time”
Developed for Not specified
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Method of administration Self-administered
Recommendations to score

Not described

Score Interpretation Higher scores signifies better health
Cut-off points ---
Cut-off points applied to Not specified
Smallest detectable change if described ---
Smallest detectable change applied to ---
Completion time by the patient 0 minutes
Scoring time by the assessor 0 minutes
Training to score Not necessary
Strengths ---
Limitations Copyrighted
OTHER COMMENTS
Other Comments ---