| Name of the Instrument/Tool | Osteoporosis and You (O&Y) |
| First Description |
Brenneman SK, Blau EM, Chen Y, Abbott TA. Validation of a patient questionnaire, ‘osteoporosis and you’, designed to assess osteoporosis related attitudes, knowledge and behavior. J Bone Miner Res. 2002; 17:S466 |
| Year | 2002 |
| Domains | |
| Concept of constructs | Disease knowledge, Self-management |
| Population/Disease | Disease specific |
| Originally developed for | Osteoporosis (OP) |
| Other rheumatic diseases where can be applied (only if validated) |
--- |
| Additional population with no rheumatic diseases |
No |
| Language: Originally published in | English |
| Available in Language | English |
| REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION | |
| Author/s | Brenneman SK, Blau EM, Chen Y, Abbott TA. 2002; 17:S466 |
| Title | Validation of a patient questionnaire, ‘osteoporosis and you’, designed to assess osteoporosis related attitudes, knowledge and behavior. |
| Journal | J Bone Miner Res. |
| Year | 2002 |
| Vol | 17 |
| Num | --- |
| Pages | S466 |
| Country | --- |
| Language | --- |
| Other references of interest | |
| Link | https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319548595_Validity_ … |
| Brief Description |
Validity, reliability, and responsiveness to change of the "Osteoporosis and You" knowledge scale. |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17333452/ |
| Brief Description |
This study assesses the psychometric properties of the 10-item knowledge component of the "Osteoporosis and You" |
| Instrument/Tool Translations References | |
| No other References. | |
| DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION | |
| Correspondence to | Brenneman SK |
| susan.brenneman@optum.com | |
| Address | OptumInsight, 12525 Technology Drive, Eden Prairie, MN 55344, USA. |
| Website | --- |
| Available | --- |
| Links | --- |
| DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT | |
| Type Of Measure | Questionnaire |
| Brief Description |
The 10-item Osteoporosis and You (O&Y) instrument assesses osteoporosis knowledge and is said to be appropriate for use among older adults due to its brevity, simplicity, and varied knowledge domains. |
| Number of Items | 10 |
| Range | 0-50 |
| Responses options/scale |
Yes strongly agree, somewhat agree, no opinion, somewhat disagree, and strongly disagree |
| Developed for | --- |
| PRACTICAL APPLICATION | |
| Method of administration | Self-administered |
| Recommendations to score |
Items need to be added to sum the total score |
| Score Interpretation | Those with higher punctuation would have higher knowledge scores. |
| Cut-off points | --- |
| Cut-off points applied to | Not specified |
| Smallest detectable change if described | --- |
| Smallest detectable change applied to | --- |
| Completion time by the patient | - minutes |
| Scoring time by the assessor | - minutes |
| Training to score | Not necessary |
| Strengths | --- |
| Limitations | Not widely used |
| OTHER COMMENTS | |
| Other Comments | --- |