| Name of the Instrument/Tool | Myositis damage Index (MDI) |
| First Description |
Isenberg DA, Allen E, Farewell V, et al. International consensus outcome measures for patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Development and initial validation of myositis activity and damage indices in patients with adult onset disease. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004;43(1):49-54. |
| Year | 2004 |
| Domains | |
| Concept of constructs | Damage |
| Population/Disease | Disease specific |
| Originally developed for | Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies (IIM) |
| Other rheumatic diseases where can be applied (only if validated) |
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) |
| Additional population with no rheumatic diseases |
No |
| Language: Originally published in | English |
| Available in Language | English |
| REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION | |
| Author/s | Isenberg DA, Allen E, Farewell V, et al. |
| Title | International consensus outcome measures for patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Development and initial validation of myositis activity and damage indices in patients with adult onset disease. |
| Journal | Rheumatology (Oxford). |
| Year | 2004 |
| Vol | 43 |
| Num | 1 |
| Pages | 49-54 |
| Country | UK |
| Language | English |
| Other references of interest | |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22588740/ |
| Brief Description |
This study summarizes the main outcome measures in adult and juvenile dermatomyositis, polymyositis, and inclusion body myositis. |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21622773/ |
| Brief Description |
This study tests the interrater reliability, internal consistency and aspects of validity of the myositis damage index (MDI). |
| Instrument/Tool Translations References | |
| No other References. | |
| DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION | |
| Correspondence to | Isenberg DA |
| d.isenberg@ucl.ac.uk | |
| Address | Center for Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, The Middlesex Hospital, University College London, London, UK. |
| Website | --- |
| Available | --- |
| Links | --- |
| DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT | |
| Type Of Measure | Questionnaire |
| Brief Description |
This tool assesses the degree of disease damage of various organ systems. It is composed of a series of organ-specific questions relating to the presence or absence of a given sign or symptom or problem to measure the extent of damage, and an overall rating of the disease damage of each system using a 10 cm. visual analogue scale to measure the severity of damage. The MDI is intended to be used in patients with adult and juvenile dermatomyositis (DM), polymyositis (PM), and inclusion body myositis (IBM). It measures specific manifestations in 11 organ systems. |
| Number of Items | There are 11 separate VAS ratings that constitute the MDI severity of damage scale. Individual items are assessed by the MDI extent of damage scale.There are 35 items in children, 37 in adolescents, and 38 in adults. |
| Range | 0 –110 |
| Responses options/scale |
Yes The 10-cm VAS are anchored at the end points and the midpoint. Each of the 11 organ systems has 3– 6 items scored as present or absent. |
| Developed for | Clinical practice |
| PRACTICAL APPLICATION | |
| Method of administration | --- |
| Recommendations to score |
For the VAS, scores for each organ system are determined by measuring the distance of the vertical line from the left-hand side of the horizontal VAS. The length of the VAS should also be measured so that the score can be adjusted to a denominator of 10 cm. For items in the damage index, the score is 1 point if present and 0 if absent. In order for an item to be scored as a damage item, the problem must have been present for at least 6 months and must be expected to persist or be irreversible and not treatable with immunosuppressive medication. |
| Score Interpretation | The VAS are summed together for a potential score of 0 –110 for the MDI severity of damage score. For each organ system, 0 =no damage and 10 =extremely severe damage. |
| Cut-off points | --- |
| Cut-off points applied to | Not specified |
| Smallest detectable change if described | --- |
| Smallest detectable change applied to | --- |
| Completion time by the patient | 20-30 minutes |
| Scoring time by the assessor | - minutes |
| Training to score | Not necessary |
| Strengths | --- |
| Limitations | --- |
| OTHER COMMENTS | |
| Other Comments | --- |