Detailled Information

Name of the Instrument/Tool Elbow Self‑Assessment Score (ESAS)
First Description

Beirer M, Friese H, Lenich A, et al. The Elbow Self-Assessment Score (ESAS): development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome measurement tool for elbow disorders. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(7):2230-2236.

Year 2017
Domains
Concept of constructs Functional status, Health related quality of life, Pain
Population/Disease Disease specific
Originally developed for Elbow disorders
Other rheumatic diseases
where can be applied (only if validated)
---
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases No
Language: Originally published in English
Available in Language English, German
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
Author/s Beirer M, Friese H, Lenich A, et al.
Title The Elbow Self-Assessment Score (ESAS): development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome measurement tool for elbow disorders.
Journal Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc.
Year 2017
Vol 25
Num 7
Pages 2230-2236.
Country Germany
Language English
Other references of interest
Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18539627/
Brief Description

Study that analyzes self-assessment instruments as additional tools for a comprehensive evaluation of the elbow.

Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27072673/
Brief Description

Retrospective case series aiming to evaluate the functional outcome of radial neck fractures treated by intramedullary pinning by using the ESAS.

Instrument/Tool Translations References
No other References.
DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION
Correspondence to Marc Beirer
E-Mail marc.beirer@mri.tum.de
Address Department of Trauma Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
Website ---
Available ---
Links ---
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Type Of Measure Questionnaire
Brief Description

The ESAS is a questionnaire for elbow disorders that contains 22 items addressing three domains: pain (seven items), elbow function including range of motion (12 items) and quality of life (three items).

Number of Items 22
Range ---
Responses options/scale No
Developed for Not specified
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Method of administration Self-administered
Recommendations to score

The best and least symptomatic score for each item is set zero and the worst ten; points are extracted from 100. The overall score is then converted to a scale of 100 %.

Score Interpretation A value of 100 % indicates an excellent result and a value of 0 % a poor result
Cut-off points ---
Cut-off points applied to ---
Smallest detectable change if described ---
Smallest detectable change applied to ---
Completion time by the patient - minutes
Scoring time by the assessor - minutes
Training to score Not necessary
Strengths Useful in clinical practice & research
Limitations Not widely used
OTHER COMMENTS
Other Comments ---