| Name of the Instrument/Tool | German Pain Management Questionnaire (GPMQ) |
| First Description |
K. Meng, B. Seekatz, H. Roband, U. Worringen, H. Vogel, H. Faller, Intermediate and long-term effects of a standardized back school for inpatient orthopedic rehabilitation on illness knowledge and self-management behaviors: a randomized controlled trial, Clin. J. Pain (2011) 248–257. |
| Year | 2011 |
| Domains | |
| Concept of constructs | Pain, Self-management |
| Population/Disease | Generic |
| Originally developed for | --- |
| Other rheumatic diseases where can be applied (only if validated) |
Low Back Pain (LBP) |
| Additional population with no rheumatic diseases |
No |
| Language: Originally published in | German |
| Available in Language | German |
| REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION | |
| Author/s | K. Meng, B. Seekatz, H. Roband, U. Worringen, H. Vogel, H. Faller, |
| Title | Intermediate and long-term effects of a standardized back school for inpatient orthopedic rehabilitation on illness knowledge and self-management behaviors: a randomized controlled trial, Clin. |
| Journal | J. Pain. |
| Year | 2011 |
| Vol | --- |
| Num | --- |
| Pages | 248-257 |
| Country | --- |
| Language | --- |
| Other references of interest | |
| Link | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29258726/ |
| Brief Description |
This SLR aims to to identify, appraise and synthesise the outcome measures used to assess self-management in patients with chronic pain |
| Instrument/Tool Translations References | |
| No other References. | |
| DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION | |
| Correspondence to | --- |
| --- | |
| Address | --- |
| Website | --- |
| Available | --- |
| Links | --- |
| DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT | |
| Type Of Measure | Scale |
| Brief Description |
This scale has two main domains: a) cognitive strategies consisting of three subscales: action-oriented coping, cognitive restructuring and coping competence and b) behavioural strategies consisting of three subscales: mental distraction, counter activities and relaxation. |
| Number of Items | 24 |
| Range | --- |
| Responses options/scale |
No |
| Developed for | Not specified |
| PRACTICAL APPLICATION | |
| Method of administration | --- |
| Recommendations to score |
This scale consists of 24 items and each item can be rated from ‘1 = do not agree at all’ to ‘6 = fully agree’. |
| Score Interpretation | Each of these subscales can be scored between 4 and 24, where a higher score indicates stronger agreement with the respective coping strategy. |
| Cut-off points | --- |
| Cut-off points applied to | --- |
| Smallest detectable change if described | --- |
| Smallest detectable change applied to | --- |
| Completion time by the patient | 0 minutes |
| Scoring time by the assessor | 0 minutes |
| Training to score | Not necessary |
| Strengths | --- |
| Limitations | Not widely used |
| OTHER COMMENTS | |
| Other Comments | --- |