Detailled Information

Name of the Instrument/Tool Arthritis Self-Management Assessment Tool (ASMAT).
First Description

Oh H, Han S, Kim S, Seo W. Development and Validity Testing of an Arthritis Self-Management Assessment Tool. Orthopedic Nursing. 2018 Jan/Feb;37(1):24-35

Year 2018
Domains
Concept of constructs Self-management
Population/Disease Generic
Originally developed for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
Other rheumatic diseases
where can be applied (only if validated)
---
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases No
Language: Originally published in Korean
Available in Language English
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
Author/s Oh H, Han S, Kim S, Seo W.
Title Development and Validity Testing of an Arthritis Self-Management Assessment Tool.
Journal Orthopedic Nursing.
Year 2018
Vol 37
Num 1
Pages 24-35
Country Korea
Language English
Other references of interest
Link Jones , F. ( 2006 ). Strategies to enhance chronic disease s …
Brief Description

This study stress the importance of self-management in chronic diseases

Link Lorig , K. R. , & Holman , H. ( 2003 ). Self-management educ …
Brief Description

This study  analyzes the important aspects on self-management by explaining  three tasks and five core strategies (problem-solving, decision-making, resource utilization, formation of a patient/healthcare provider partnership, and taking action) on the basis of the experiences of the authors, a literature review, and on the findings of a qualitative study conducted by Corbin and Straus (1988) . These tasks and strategies clearly revealed the multidimensional, complex nature of self-management.

Instrument/Tool Translations References
No other References.
DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION
Correspondence to HyunSoo Oh, PhD, RN,
E-Mail hsoh@inha.ac.kr
Address Department of Nursing, Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Website ---
Available ---
Links ---
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Type Of Measure Questionnaire
Brief Description

The ASMAT consists of three subscales (medical, behavioral, and psychoemotional management tasks), and each of these subscales contained items refl ecting the fi e core strategies. The final version contained 10 items on medical management, 13 items on behavioral management, and 9 items on psychoemotional management

Number of Items 32
Range ---
Responses options/scale Yes
four-point Likert-type response format(always, often, seldom, and never).
Developed for Not specified
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Method of administration Self-administered
Recommendations to score

For every item there is a four-point Likert-type response format (always, often, seldom, and never) that need to be addded up.

Score Interpretation Higher scores indicate higher levels of self-management.
Cut-off points ---
Cut-off points applied to ---
Smallest detectable change if described ---
Smallest detectable change applied to ---
Completion time by the patient 10-15 minutes
Scoring time by the assessor 0 minutes
Training to score Not necessary
Strengths ---
Limitations Not widely used
OTHER COMMENTS
Other Comments ---