Detailled Information

Name of the Instrument/Tool The McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ)
First Description

Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1975;1:277–99.

Year 1975
Domains
Concept of constructs Pain
Population/Disease Disease specific
Originally developed for ---
Other rheumatic diseases
where can be applied (only if validated)
---
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases No
Language: Originally published in English
Available in Language Czech, Dutch, English, French, Greek, Italian, Norwegian, Portuguese, Spanish, Turkish, Japanese
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
Author/s Melzack R.
Title The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods.
Journal Pain
Year 1975
Vol 1
Num 3
Pages 277-99
Country Canada
Language ---
Other references of interest
Link Wilkie DJ, Savedra MC, HolzemerWL, et al. Use ofthe McGill P …
Brief Description

Meta-analysis of 51 studies about the MPQ score

Link Burckhardt CS. The use of the McGill Pain Questionnaire in a …
Brief Description

A study with the objective to assess arthritis pain, reported good reproducibility and sensitivity to change for the MPQ score.

Instrument/Tool Translations References
Link Menezes Costa Lda C, Maher CG, McAuley JH, Costa LO. Systema …
Brief Description

In this SLR, forty-four different versions of the MPQ were identified representing 26 different languages/cultures

DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION
Correspondence to Ronald Melzack
E-Mail ronald.melzack@mcgill.ca
Address Department of Psychology, and Pain Rehabilitation Research Unit of the Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal Canada
Website ---
Available ---
Links ---
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Type Of Measure Questionnaire
Brief Description

The MPQ is a list of 78 verbal descriptors grouped into 20 subclasses (each of which covers one aspect of the pain). These 20 subclasses are distributed among four classes: sensory or sensory-discriminative, affective or affective-emotional, evaluative, and miscellaneous (sensory-affective). T

Number of Items 79
Range 0-78
Responses options/scale Yes
10
Developed for ---
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Method of administration Self-administered
Recommendations to score

Seven words are selected from the following categories: dimension 1 to 10 (pain descriptors), three words; dimensions 11 to 15 (affective components of pain), dimension 16 (evaluation of pain) one word, and dimension 17 to 20 (miscellaneous) one word. Scores are tabulated by summing values associated with each word.

Score Interpretation scores range from 0 (no pain) to 78 (severe pain)
Cut-off points No cutoff has been determined to assist in interpreting the results
Cut-off points applied to ---
Smallest detectable change if described ---
Smallest detectable change applied to ---
Completion time by the patient 5-10 minutes
Scoring time by the assessor 0 minutes
Training to score Not necessary
Strengths Useful in clinical practice & research, Widely used
Limitations Lengthy
OTHER COMMENTS
Other Comments ---