Detailled Information

Name of the Instrument/Tool Myositis Activity Profile (MAP)
First Description

J Rheumatol

Year 2012
Domains
Concept of constructs Physical function, Social Function
Population/Disease Disease specific
Originally developed for Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies (IIM)
Other rheumatic diseases
where can be applied (only if validated)
---
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases No
Language: Originally published in Swedish
Available in Language English, Swedish
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
Author/s Alexanderson H, Lundberg IE, Stenstrom CH.
Title Development of the myositis activities profile—validity and reliability of a self-administered questionnaire to assess activity limitations in patients with polymyositis/dermatomyositis
Journal J Rheumatol
Year 2002
Vol 29
Num ---
Pages 2386–92
Country ---
Language ---
Other references of interest
Link https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22942260
Brief Description

To evaluate some measurement properties of the Myositis Activities Profile (MAP) in adult patients with polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM) in the United States.

Instrument/Tool Translations References
No other References.
DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION
Correspondence to L. Christopher-Stine
E-Mail lchrist4@jhmi.edu
Address 5200 Eastern Ave., Mason F. Lord Center Tower, Suite 4500, Baltimore, Maryland 21224, USA
Website ---
Available ---
Links ---
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Type Of Measure Questionnaire
Brief Description

To assess limitations, difficulty and importance in daily activities of PM and DM in adult patients. 31 items divided into 4 subscales (movement, moving around, personal hygiene, domestic) and 4 single items (social activities, moving around, work/school, leisure activities). Each subscale is scored separately.

Number of Items 31 items (Swedish), 32 items (English)
Range ---
Responses options/scale No
Developed for Both
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Method of administration Self-administered
Recommendations to score

Each subscale is scored separately

Score Interpretation ---
Cut-off points ---
Cut-off points applied to ---
Smallest detectable change if described ---
Smallest detectable change applied to ---
Completion time by the patient 0 minutes
Scoring time by the assessor 0 minutes
Training to score Not necessary
Strengths Easy to use
Limitations ---
OTHER COMMENTS
Other Comments ---