Detailled Information

Name of the Instrument/Tool The Modified Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (mBCTQ)
First Description

Journal of Arthritis and Rheumatism

Year 1998
Domains
Concept of constructs Physical function
Population/Disease Disease specific
Originally developed for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Other rheumatic diseases
where can be applied (only if validated)
---
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases No
Language: Originally published in English
Available in Language English, Malay
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
Author/s El Miedany Y, Ashour S, Youssef S, Mehanna A, El Gaafary M
Title Validation of the modified self-administered questionnaire for assessment of functional status in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.
Journal Journal of Arthritis and Rheumatism
Year 2006
Vol 54
Num 9
Pages S650
Country USA
Language English
Other references of interest
No other References.
Instrument/Tool Translations References
No other References.
DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION
Correspondence to Y El Miedany
E-Mail miedanycrd@yahoo.com
Address ---
Website www.rheumatology4u.com
Available ---
Links ---
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Type Of Measure Questionnaire
Brief Description

The questionnaire contains 10 items that rate the degree of functional ability on a 5-point scale. The final score (sum of individual scores divided by number of items) ranges from 1 to 5, with a higher score indicating greater disability. The modified BCTQ can be self-, interview-, or telephone-administered.

Number of Items 10
Range 1-5
Responses options/scale Yes
1-5
Developed for Both
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Method of administration Interviewer/assessor, Self-administered
Recommendations to score ---
Score Interpretation Score: 1-5.Mean of each scale items scores
Cut-off points ---
Cut-off points applied to ---
Smallest detectable change if described ---
Smallest detectable change applied to ---
Completion time by the patient 0 minutes
Scoring time by the assessor 0 minutes
Training to score Not necessary
Strengths Easy to use, Useful in clinical practice & research
Limitations ---
OTHER COMMENTS
Other Comments ---