| MEASUREMENT PROPERTIES | |
| Limitations | <5 European languages (English) |
| Observations |
Available in English, Turkish and Brazilian Portuguese |
| 1. RELIABILITY | |
| A. Internal Consistency | Tested |
| Cronbach's (Describe) |
Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20):0.95 |
| B. Reliability intraobserver or test-retest | Tested |
| Continuous scores: intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) Dichotomus: Cohen kappa (Describe) |
Two-week interval postal questionnaire: Spearman’s rho 0.84 Analysis of the AS-WIS and AS Qaulity of Life scores for the respondents in work showed a correlation of 0.84 (Sperman’s rho) showing that 72% of the variation in Quality of life of those is associated with their level of WI. |
| C. Reliability interobserver or Measurement error | Not Tested |
| Standard error of measurement (SEM), smallest detectable change (SDC) or Limits of agreement (LoA) (Describe) |
|
| 2. VALIDITY | |
| A. Content validity: face validity | Tested |
| Expert opinion (relevance and comprehensiveness) (Describe) |
Qualitative interviews; 1st Postal questionnaire; Final item reduction; 2nd Postal questionnaire AS-WIS is a simple 20 item questionnaire to measure Work Instability in AS. In the final scale half the items where shared with the original RA-WIS providing evidence of the communality of some aspects of WI, but also the unique elements brought to the concept by each diagnostic group. |
| B. Construct Validity: Structural validity |
Tested |
| Hypotheses-testing | Not Tested |
| Cross-cultural validity | Tested |
| Brief Description |
Item-trait interaction χ²: 24.8; DF 20; p=0.21 The scale showed good fit to Rash model expectations and satisfied the test for unidimensionality (independent t test 10.8% 95% CI 5-17%). The targeting of the scale was good, with a mean person estimate of 0.033 logits SD 2.315, suggesting the scale to be centered on the person distribution. |
| C. Criterion validity | Tested |
| Comparison with a 'gold standard' Continuous scores: correlations, ROC curves Dichotomus: Sensitivity & Specificity (Describe) |
Tested by Fabreguet et al (Rheumatology 2011), non-parametric Spearman's correlations. Correlations of the AS-WIS score with SpA scores were significant (P < 0.0001) but moderate: BASDAI R = 0.42, BASFI R = 0.41, Patient's global assessment R = 0.53; |