VALIDATION DATA

MEASUREMENT PROPERTIES
Limitations >=5 European languages (English)
Observations
1. RELIABILITY
A. Internal Consistency Tested
Cronbach's (Describe)

Cronbach’s alpha reported in 4 papers showed values that ranged from 0.872 to 0.914.

B. Reliability intraobserver or test-retest Tested
Continuous scores: intraclass
correlation coefficient (ICC)
Dichotomus: Cohen kappa (Describe)

ICC ranged from 0.817 to 0.971. The test–retest correlation for the total score was 0.817, indicating a high level of reliability between administrations.

C. Reliability interobserver or Measurement error Tested
Standard error of measurement (SEM),
smallest detectable change (SDC) or
Limits of agreement (LoA) (Describe)

A cut-off score of 40 out of 100 on the CSI produced good sensitivity (81%) in correctly identifying a group of central sensitization syndrome patients, and acceptable specificity (75%) in correctly identifying a group of non-patient comparison subjects

2. VALIDITY
A. Content validity: face validity Tested
Expert opinion (relevance and
comprehensiveness) (Describe)

Several studies reported on content validity using “excellent” quality evidence.

B. Construct Validity:
Structural validity
Tested
Hypotheses-testing Tested
Cross-cultural validity Tested
Brief Description

Factor analyses reported that 4 factors accounted for 53.4% of their variance.

In a study on knee OA, the initial evaluation with Rasch modelling indicated misfit. Eleven of 25 items on the CSI displayed disordered thresholds which were rescored by collapsing response categories until the thresholds demonstrated sequential progression. Reanalysis demonstrated persistent model misfit so a subtest was developed to address local dependency of 6 items. Thereafter, model fit was achieved (P = 0.071, indicating not differing from Rasch model) and acceptable unidimensionality (P = 0.068 with 95% CI 0.043-0.093).

C. Criterion validity Tested
Comparison with a 'gold standard' Continuous scores:
correlations, ROC curves Dichotomus:
Sensitivity & Specificity (Describe)

Several studies reported "good" to "excellent" criterion validity. COSMIN definition of criterion validity necessitates a gold standard. The standard in these studies was clinician diagnoses of 1 or more central sensitivity syndromes