Detailled Information

Name of the Instrument/Tool Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI)
First Description

Mayer TG, Neblett R, Cohen H, et al. The development and psychometric validation of the central sensitization inventory. Pain Practice 2012; 12(4):276-285.

Year 2012
Domains
Concept of constructs Pain
Population/Disease Generic
Originally developed for ---
Other rheumatic diseases
where can be applied (only if validated)
Fibromyalgia (FM), Osteoarthritis (OA), Chronic musculoskeletal pain
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases No
Language: Originally published in English
Available in Language Danish, Portuguese, Russian, Greek, French, Spanish, Dutch, Polish, English, Swedish
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
Author/s Mayer TG, Neblett R, Cohen H, Howard KJ, Choi YH, Williams MJ, Perez Y, Gatchel RJ.
Title The development and psychometric validation of the central sensitization inventory.
Journal Pain Practice
Year 2012
Vol 12
Num (4):
Pages 276-285
Country United States of America
Language English
Other references of interest
Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35754083/
Brief Description

Validity of the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) through Rasch analysis in patients with knee osteoarthritis. 

Link https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jabr.12123
Brief Description

This article provides an overview of CSI rationale, development, recommended uses, and research results, including evidence of validity and reliability, in clinical and non-clinical subject samples.

Link https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28851012
Brief Description

SLR with the objective to determine the quality of evidence these publications reported, and examine the measurement properties of the CSI.

Instrument/Tool Translations References
Link https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27818875
Brief Description

Cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Spanish central sensitization inventory.

Link https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5589103/
Brief Description

 Assessment of the psychometric properties of the CSI, adapted and validated for a Brazilian population (CSI-BP).

Link https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22035625
Brief Description

A systematic literature review (SLR) addressing central sensitization and central nociceptive processing in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36097821/

Salaffi F, Farah S, Mariani C, Sarzi-Puttini P, Di Carlo M. Validity of the Central Sensitization Inventory compared with traditional measures of disease severity in fibromyalgia. Pain Pract. 2022 Nov;22(8):702-710. doi: 10.1111/papr.13162. Epub 2022 Sep 22. PMID: 36097821; PMCID: PMC9826291.

DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION
Correspondence to Robert J. Gatchel, PhD,
E-Mail gatchel@uta.edu
Address Department of Psychology, College of Science, The University of Texas at Arlington, 5701 Maple Ave. no. 100, Dallas, TX 75235, U.S.A.
Website ---
Available ---
Links ---
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Type Of Measure Questionnaire
Brief Description

The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) may be used to determine severity of central sensitization pain. The CSI has two parts, Part A and Part B. For scoring purposes you will only look at the 25 questions in Part A. Part B was initially used to help correlate the results with previous diagnoses. 

Number of Items 25
Range 0-100
Responses options/scale Yes
5
Developed for Both
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Method of administration Self-administered
Recommendations to score

Each question may be answered as follows: Never (0 points), Rarely (1 point), Sometimes (2 points), Often (3 points), or Always (4 points). 

Score Interpretation Total points reflect the severity of central sensitization pain.
Cut-off points Score ranges and the intensity of CSP they represent are: Subclinical: 0 to 29 Mild: 30 to 39 Moderate: 40 to 49 Severe: 50 to 59 Extreme: 60 to 100
Cut-off points applied to Not specified
Smallest detectable change if described ---
Smallest detectable change applied to ---
Completion time by the patient 5 minutes
Scoring time by the assessor - minutes
Training to score Not necessary
Strengths Useful in clinical practice & research, Easy to use
Limitations ---
OTHER COMMENTS
Other Comments