Name of the Instrument/Tool | European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) |
First Description |
Seror R, Ravaud P, Mariette X, et al EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI): development of a consensus patient index for primary Sjögren's syndrome Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2011;70:968-972. |
Year | 2011 |
Domains | |
Concept of constructs | Disease activity, Fatigue, Pain, Skin, Symptom severity |
Population/Disease | Disease specific |
Originally developed for | Sjögren's syndrome |
Other rheumatic diseases where can be applied (only if validated) |
--- |
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases |
No |
Language: Originally published in | English |
Available in Language | Portuguese |
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION | |
Author/s | Seror R, Theander E, Brun JG, et al. |
Title | Validation of EULAR primary Sjögren's syndrome disease activity (ESSDAI) and patient indexes (ESSPRI). |
Journal | Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases |
Year | 2015 |
Vol | 74 |
Num | --- |
Pages | 859-866 |
Country | --- |
Language | English |
Other references of interest | |
Link | http://ard.bmj.com/content/70/6/968 |
Brief Description |
Development of the PRO. |
Instrument/Tool Translations References | |
Link | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0482-50042015000500439& … |
Brief Description |
Validation into Portuguese |
DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION | |
Correspondence to | Dr Raphaèle Seror |
raphaele.se@gmail.com | |
Address | Department of Rheumatology, Hôpital Bicêtre, 78 rue du Général Leclerc, 94275 Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France |
Website | --- |
Available | --- |
Links | --- |
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT | |
Type Of Measure | NRS |
Brief Description | --- |
Number of Items | 3 |
Range | 0-10 |
Responses options/scale |
Yes 0-10 |
Developed for | Both |
PRACTICAL APPLICATION | |
Method of administration | Self-administered |
Recommendations to score |
The total score is the mean score of the 3 scales. |
Score Interpretation | The larger the greater the severity of symptoms. |
Cut-off points | --- |
Cut-off points applied to | --- |
Smallest detectable change if described | --- |
Smallest detectable change applied to | --- |
Completion time by the patient | <3 minutes |
Scoring time by the assessor | <1 minutes |
Training to score | Not necessary |
Strengths | Easy to use |
Limitations | --- |
OTHER COMMENTS | |
Other Comments | --- |