Detailled Information

Name of the Instrument/Tool Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES)
First Description

Lorig K, Chastain RL, Ung E, Shoor S, Holman HR. Development and evaluation of a scale to measure perceived self‐efficacy in people with arthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 1989;32(1):37-44.

Year 1989
Domains
Concept of constructs Self-management
Population/Disease Generic
Originally developed for Fibromyalgia (FM), Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Osteoarthritis (OA)
Other rheumatic diseases
where can be applied (only if validated)
---
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases No
Language: Originally published in English
Available in Language German, English, Spanish, Chinese, Dutch, Swedish, Turkish
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
Author/s Lorig K, Chastain RL, Ung E, Shoor S, Holman HR
Title Development and evaluation of a scale to measure perceived self-efficacy in people with arthritis
Journal Arthritis Rheum
Year 1989
Vol 32
Num 1
Pages 37-44
Country USA
Language English
Other references of interest
Link http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10204758
Brief Description

The relationship of arthritis self-efficacy to daily pain, daily mood, and daily pain coping in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29258726/
Brief Description

This SLR aims to to identify, appraise and synthesise the outcome measures used to assess self-management in patients with chronic pain

Instrument/Tool Translations References
Link http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1439373
Brief Description

Evaluation of a Swedish version of the Arthritis Self-efficacy Scale. Scand J Caring Sci 1992;6:131–8.

DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION
Correspondence to Kate Lorig
E-Mail Lorig@Stanford.edu; self-management@stanford.edu
Address Stanford Patient Education Research Center 1000 Welch Road, Suite 204 Palo Alto CA 94304
Website http://patienteducation.stanford.edu/
Available ---
Links

http://patienteducation.stanford.edu/research/searthritis.pdf

DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Type Of Measure Questionnaire
Brief Description

The ASES was developed to measure patients’ arthritis-specific self-efficacy, or patients’ beliefs that they could perform specific tasks or behaviors to cope with the consequences of arthritis. It remains the most widely used arthritis-specific measure.

It was  measures three SM constructs: pain self-efficacy (five items), function self-efficacy (nine items) and other symptoms self-efficacy (six items). The subscales should not be combined.

Number of Items Original ASES has 20 items in 3 subscales: self-efficacy for managing pain (PSE), 5 items; selfefficacy for physical function (FSE), 9 items; and selfefficacy for controlling other symptoms (OSE), 6 items. A shorter 8-item version of the ASES is available
Range 1-10 for each subscale
Responses options/scale Yes
1–10 scale (recommended). From ‘1 = very uncertain’ to ‘10 = very certain’.
Developed for Clinical practice, Research
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Method of administration Self-administered
Recommendations to score

Each subscale is scored separately by taking the mean score of the items. For the shorter 8-item scale, the score is the mean of the eight items.

Score Interpretation Higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy.
Cut-off points Respondents that rate 7 or above are more likely to accomplish the behavior than those who rate below 7. Suggested to report the percent of the population at 7 or above at baseline and at post test to get an idea if SE is really improving.
Cut-off points applied to ---
Smallest detectable change if described not available
Smallest detectable change applied to ---
Completion time by the patient <10 minutes
Scoring time by the assessor 0 minutes
Training to score Not necessary
Strengths Useful in clinical practice & research, Easy to use, Widely used
Limitations ---
OTHER COMMENTS
Other Comments

Self-Efficacy Scale (SES) is a variant of the ASES for other diseases; it is a 11-item scale that was developed by using pain and other symptoms subscales of the original ASES. Each item can be rated using a 10-point graphic/numeric rating for example, ‘1 (or 10) = very uncertain’ to ‘10 (or 100) = very certain’. The phrase ‘arthritis pain’ is usually changed according to the specific disease population, for example, ‘chronic pain’ or ‘back pain’.