Detailled Information

Name of the Instrument/Tool Multi-Dimensional Patient Reported Outcome Measures Questionnaire for Fibromyalgia (PROMs-FM)
First Description

El Miedany, Y., El Gaafary, M., Youssef, S., & Ahmed, I. (2016). Towards tailored patient's management approach: Integrating the modified 2010 ACR criteria for fibromyalgia in multidimensional patient reported outcome measures questionnaire. Arthritis.

Year 2016
Domains
Concept of constructs Coping & helplessness, Fatigue, Global assessment, Health related quality of life, Pain, Physical function, Self-management
Population/Disease Disease specific
Originally developed for Fibromyalgia (FM)
Other rheumatic diseases
where can be applied (only if validated)
---
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases No
Language: Originally published in English
Available in Language English
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
Author/s El Miedany Y, El Gaafary M, Youssef S, El Aroussy N, Ahmed I, Palmer D.
Title Towards a Multidimensional Patient Reported Outcome Measures Assessment: Development and Validation of a Questionnaire for Patients with Fibromyalgia
Journal Ann Rheum Dis
Year 2013
Vol 72
Num Suppl 3
Pages 719
Country UK
Language English
Other references of interest
No other References.
Instrument/Tool Translations References
No other References.
DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION
Correspondence to Yasser El Miedany
E-Mail drelmiedany@rheumatology4u.com
Address ---
Website ---
Available ---
Links ---
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Type Of Measure Composite Index, Questionnaire
Brief Description

The questionnaire includes assessment of functional disability, quality of life, VAS (0-100) for sleep disturbance, waking feeling unrefreshed, global status, fatigue, body pain and impact of mood changes, in addition to review of the systems, falls and cardiovascular risks, self-helplessness as well as self-reported soft tissue painful areas. It is unclear if it is scored overall or by parts.

Number of Items 33
Range not defined
Responses options/scale Yes
and ticks.
Developed for Both
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Method of administration Self-administered
Recommendations to score

Not available.

Score Interpretation Not defined.
Cut-off points Not defined.
Cut-off points applied to ---
Smallest detectable change if described Not defined.
Smallest detectable change applied to ---
Completion time by the patient 7.04 ± 0.92 min minutes
Scoring time by the assessor 0 minutes
Training to score Not necessary
Strengths Useful in clinical practice & research
Limitations Complex scoring, Lengthy, Not widely used
OTHER COMMENTS
Other Comments

Only available as an abstract.