Detailled Information

Name of the Instrument/Tool Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20)
First Description

Smets E, Garssen B, Bonke Bd, De Haes J. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. Journal of psychosomatic research. 1995;39(3):315-25.

Year 1995
Domains
Concept of constructs Fatigue, Functional status
Population/Disease Generic
Originally developed for ---
Other rheumatic diseases
where can be applied (only if validated)
Fibromyalgia (FM), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV)
Additional population with no rheumatic diseases Yes
cancer, liver disease
Language: Originally published in English
Available in Language Danish, Croatian, Chinese, Norwegian, Finnish, French, Romanian, Korean, Spanish, Swedish, Czech, Italian, German, Polish, Lithuanian, Dutch
REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
Author/s Smets EM, Garssen B, Bonke B, De Haes JC
Title The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue
Journal Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Year 1995
Vol 39
Num 3
Pages 315-25
Country Netherlands
Language English
Other references of interest
Link https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8546913
Brief Description

Application of the multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI-20) in cancer patients receiving radiotherapy.

Link https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18085596
Brief Description

Measuring fatigue among women with Sjogren’s syndrome or rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison of the Profile of Fatigue (ProF) and the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI).

Link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26713864/
Brief Description

Physical Fatigue, Fitness, and Muscle Function in Patients With Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis.

Instrument/Tool Translations References
Link https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12641557
Brief Description

Validation of the French 'multidimensional fatigue inventory' (MFI 20). 

Link https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17852297
Brief Description
Assessment of fatigue in patients with fibromyalgia and chronic widespread pain. Reliability and validity of the Swedish version of the MFI-20. 
Link http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20189864
Brief Description
Linguistic validation of six patient-reported outcomes instruments into 12 languages for patients with fibromyalgia. 
DEVELOPER CONTACT INFORMATION
Correspondence to Smets EM
E-Mail e.m.smets@amc.uva.nl
Address Medical Psychology J3-220, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Website www.amc.nl/MedPsych
Available the developer can be contacted.
Links

The MFI-20 is copyrighted on the names of the authors. The MFI is free for academic use, charges apply for commercial use. For further information, the developers can be contacted.

DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT
Type Of Measure Questionnaire, Scale
Brief Description

The MFI was originally developed to measure cancer fatigue and it was evaluated initially in cancer and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) patients and in healthy volunteers who might be physically tired (army recruits) or cognitively tired (junior doctors).

The MFI covers domains of general fatigue, physical fatigue, activity, motivation, and mental fatigue (5 subscales with 4 items each). Each item had 7 response options in the original MFI-20, but this was revised to the current version with 5 response options.

Number of Items 20 items; 5 subscales
Range 4-20 for each subscale
Responses options/scale Yes
scored 1–5
Developed for Not specified
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Method of administration Self-administered
Recommendations to score

Items are scored 1–5, with 10 positively phrased items reverse scored (this concerns following items: 2, 5, 9, 10, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19). For each of the 5 scales (general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced activity, reduced motivation, and mental fatigue) a total score is calculated by summation of the scores of the individual items. Scores can range from the minimum of 4 to the maximum of 20. The use of a total score over all 20 items is not recommended.

Score Interpretation Higher scores reflect greater severity/ higher fatigue.
Cut-off points ---
Cut-off points applied to ---
Smallest detectable change if described ---
Smallest detectable change applied to ---
Completion time by the patient - minutes
Scoring time by the assessor - minutes
Training to score Not necessary
Strengths Useful in clinical practice & research
Limitations Floor effect
OTHER COMMENTS
Other Comments ---